Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04703-03
Original file (04703-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  NAVYANNEX 

WASHINGTON  DC  20370-5100 

JLP:ecb 
Docket No:  4703-03 
29 July 2003 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title 10 of  the United States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered your application on 29 July 2003.  Your allegations of error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  PERS  memorandum  1780 PERS-604 of  1 July 2003, a copy of  which  is 
attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your applicalio~~ has b c u  denied.  The  namcs and  voles of 
the members of  the panel will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 

1780 
PERS-604 
1 Jul 03 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Via : 

Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

Ref: 

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 25 Jun 03 
(b) Veterans Improvement Act of 1996  (PL 104-275) 
(c) Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of 

2000 (PL 106-419) 

(d) CNO WASHINGTON DC 031700Z May Ol(NAVADM1N 105/01) 
(e) Title 38, United States Code, Chapter 32 

1.  The following is provided in response to reference (a): 

a.  Recommend denial of 

request to convert from 

the Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) to the 
Montgomery GI Bill  (MGIB) Program.  He did not meet the 
eligibility requirements of reference (b) and did not make an 
election when afforded the opportunity by reference (c). 

b.  Reference (b) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active 

duty members with money in a VEAP acqount on 9 October 1996 
(date of enactment).  Review 0f-v~~~ 
reflects he received a refund of his contributions on 
18 Ju 
date. 
9 October 1996 which made him ineligible to -  convert to the MGIB 
Program under Public Law 104-275.  -is 
correct when he 
stated he was not notified of this conversion opportunity by 
PERS-604.  Only those members who were eligible to convert to 
the MGIB Program were notified of the opportunity. 

id not recontribute to his account after that 
VEAP account had a zero balance on 

account record 

c.  Per reference (c), an individual who was a VEAP 

participant on or before 9 October 1996 and served continuously 
from that date through at least 1 April 2000 was allowed an 
opportunity to convert from VEAP to the MGIB Program.  The 
deadline to convert was 31 October 2001.  Following enactment of 
r e f c ~ - r , n r c  (c) , N a v y   attemptcd w i d e s t   dissemination of  the 
opportunity for eligible personnel to convert to the MGIB 

Subj :  REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO 

Program.  This included NAVADMIN 105/01 (reference (d) ) ,  
notification on all Leave and ~arnings Statements from January 
through May 2001 with final notice in September 2001 and 
individual letters.  -notification 
to him at UIC 62102 in April 2001.  Records indicate 

letter was mailed 

transfer date from that UIC was 15 August 2001, 
which means the letter should have reached his command long 
before he detached.  1f-didn't 
PERS-604, the notifications on his LES' were provided in ample 
time for him to contact PERS-604 or his personnel office about 
eligibility before the legislated deadline. 

receive the letter from 

d.  Since 

is a VEAP participant and did not 

convert to the MGIB Program, he retains VEAP as his educational 
benefit program.  Per reference (e) , while 
active duty, he can contribute up to $2,700 to his VEAP account. 

is on 

2.  PERS-604's point of contact is M s . w w h o  can be 
reached at  (DSN) 882-4260 or  (C) 901-874-4260. 

Head, &tired  Activities and 
GI Bill Programs Branch 
(PERS-604) 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06434-03

    Original file (06434-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Following enactment of reference (c), Navy attempted widest dissemination of the opportunity for eligible personnel to convert to the MGIB Program. Other notification was provided in ample time for members who didn't receive a letter to contact PERS-604 about their eligibility before the legislated deadline.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04755-03

    Original file (04755-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2003. Reference (c) provided an opportunity for active duty VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI ill (MGIB) Program provided they were on active duty and had contributions in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). ~eview of his record revealed -was eligible for conversion under reference (c) because he did not a VEAP participant,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05959-01

    Original file (05959-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was closed to new enrollments on 30 June 1985, Members who did not enroll before these deadlines Program (VEAP). references (c) and participate in VEAP. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to In some cases, members enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05723-01

    Original file (05723-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend the Board deny - 's request to enroll VEAP was available to members who entered the thae Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). Reference (c) offered Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). (d) for members like AM1 Unfortunately, no pro Per reference (d), an s were made in who did not ’ ’ C. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to Unfortunately, In some cases,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04264-01

    Original file (04264-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following is provided in response to reference (a): Recommend the Board deny Veterans Educational Assistance Program Per (b),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-01

    Original file (07937-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandu~n 1780 Pers 604 of l l January 2002, a copy of which is attached. c. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00094-03

    Original file (00094-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment) . Additionally, since XXX was not a VEAP participant, he was not eligible for conversion to the MGIB Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01975-03

    Original file (01975-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). As stated above, references (c) and (d) provided opportunities to "VEAP participants" not 'VEAP-era members. could convert VEAP eligibility to states he was never afforded the he learned of a period of time when was not d. Granting the petitioner's request will not guarantee the Department of Veterans Affairs will award VEAP or MGIB Program benefits since...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04627-00

    Original file (04627-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allowed Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02930-01

    Original file (02930-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material applicable statutes, regulations BlJPERS opinion furnished by which is attached. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active Per reference (d), duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). (c) or (d) for members like MS1 VEAP.