Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04808-01
Original file (04808-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

/
\

i

TJR
Docket No: 4808-01
26 December 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj :

Ref:

Encl:

CORD OF

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of them Marine Corps filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting that the characterization of his
ldischarge  be changed.

The Board, consisting of Messrs.  

2.
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19
December 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

Documentary material considered by

Leeman, Lightle, and Morgan,

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and  
follows:

fnjustice finds as

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in a

timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

.

Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 November

196: at the age of 19.

d.

Petitioner served for more than two years without

incident, including nearly a year of service in Vietnam, when
received the Combat Action Ribbon.

he

On 2 November 1970

after his return from Vietnam

PetTtioner  submitted a written statement in which he admitted to
taking lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) while serving in Vietnam.
His statement further requested that he be discharged because he
could no longer tolerate the strain of military life.
statement noted, in part, as follows:

His

I started on drugs

When I returned home from

I have been having trouble with drugs.
while on a tour of Vietnam.
I was very nervous and (to)
overseas I started taking LSD.
try to solve small problems I would turn to LSD, but it would
only prolong it and often increased  
stopped taking these drugs but I have had flashbacks from
them.
I can no longer cope with the mental strain as in
military.
end up with more serious problems.
disgrace the service if I should have more flashbacks and do
something not in the conduct of a serviceman.
sure if I am capable of staying away from drugs as long as I
have the mental strain in the service.

the.
I am requesting discharge from active duty before I

I also do not wish to

it's seriousness.

I am also not

I have

e.

On 16 November 1970 the commanding officer noted that

However, the commanding officer recommended Petitioner

Petitioner's record reflected above average proficiency and
conduct marks, and contained no record of any disciplinary
action.
be discharged by reason of unsuitability as evidenced by his
apathetic attitude towards all aspects of military life and his
intense desire to be discharged from active duty.
1970 the commanding general directed a general discharge by
reason of unsuitability.

On 23 November

f.

On 1 December 1970 Petitioner was issued a general

discharge under honorable conditions by reason of unsuitability.
At the time of his discharge Petitioner's conduct and proficiency
averages were 4.2 and 4.3, respectively.
Petitioner's discharge, averages of 4.0 in conduct and 3.8 in
proficiency were required for a fully honorable characterization
of service.
characterization in accordance the mark averages was deemed
inappropriate, the case should be sent to Headquarters, Marine
Corps (HQMC) for a final determination.

Applicable regulations indicated that if

At the time of

g.

Petitioner provided with his application a written

statement dated 14 March 2000,
the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), which notes that he
has been diagnosed with a post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The psychologist also noted that Petitioner suffered from the
symptoms of PTSD during his active duty service in Vietnam.

from a clinical psychologist with

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.

the

However, the Board believes relief

The Board believes that Petitioner's use of drugs was a

The Board notes the Petitioner's admittance of drug use and does
not condone his infractions.
is warranted based on Petitioner's length of service, especially
his unblemished combat service in Vietnam,
PTSD.
symptom of the PTSD.
sufficiently high conduct and proficiency marks: Further, the
commanding general directed a general despite those marks, and
the directive indicated that such action should only be taken by
HQMC.
Based on the foregoing the Board concludes that no useful
purpose is served by continuing to characterize Petitioner's
service as having been under honorable conditions, and
recharacterization to a fully honorable discharge is appropriate.

The Board further notes Petitioner's

his.diagnoses  of

and 

In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

the Board finds the existence of an

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that

he was honorably discharged on 1  
discharge under honorable conditions on the same day.

December..1970  vice the general

b.

That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating

to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

C .

That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's

naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings,
maintained for such purpose,
part of Petitioner's naval record.

for retention in a confidential file
with no cross reference being made a

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations,
and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

.

Acting Recorder

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

3

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures  of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
'announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

has been approved by the Board on

4



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2011-116

    Original file (2011-116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On December 23, 1970, a chief warrant officer (CWO) reported that the day before, he had been advised that the applicant had told someone that he had a date that night even though he was restricted to Base. The Board finds that the application was untimely because it was submitted approximately 40 years after the applicant received his general discharge for unfitness. His military records support the reason for and character of his discharge, and he was afforded the due process then...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03468-01

    Original file (03468-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3468-01 31 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (b) Navy-Marine Corps Awards Manual (1) DD Form (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 149‘w/attachments I From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, requesting, in effect, show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 May 1972 and that he be awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016388

    Original file (20140016388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing, on 3 September 2014 the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to carefully consider the revised PTSD criteria, detailed medical considerations and mitigating factors when taking action on applications from former service members administratively discharged UOTHC and who have been diagnosed with PTSD by a competent mental health professional representing a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2910-13

    Original file (NR2910-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your characterization of service given your NUP,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00128-01

    Original file (00128-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted the earnings statement you submit to support your contention that you have matured over the years since your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 08518-04

    Original file (08518-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. This man shows evidence of an antisocial personality disorder of moderate severity which existed prior to enlistment, and certainly makes him unsuitable for continued Naval Service. Minimum average marks of 3.0 in conduct and 2.7 in overall traits were required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of your separation.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00871

    Original file (ND99-00871.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member signed page 13 accepting Level III treatment for drug abuse. Service member will be administratively separated after completion of Level III treatment for both alcohol and drugs. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to applicant’s issue 1, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05350-07

    Original file (05350-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 5350-07 2 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: AVAL RECORD O REVIEW OF Ni Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. With his application, he also provided psychiatric treatment records from 10 October 2006 to 9 April 2007, and a letter from the treating psychiatrist, Dr. Ehtesham, who states that he is diagnosed as having severe PTSD and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1813 14

    Original file (NR1813 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service, The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service, Vietnam service , desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion that your post service diagnosed Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) contributed to your misconduct while on active duty. The policy specifically...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08505-00

    Original file (08505-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlistment member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 23 March 1971. considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner...