Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07218-98
Original file (07218-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 7218-98
30 March 1999

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum   1830 PERS 823 SER 267 of 5 February 1999, a
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

’

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY  PERSONNEL COMMAND
INTECRlTY  DRIVE
MILLINDTON  TN 2805 5-0000

5720 

1830
Pers823
Ser 267
5 Feb 1999

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj

RECOMMENDATIONS ICO E

Ref

(a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 5 Jan 1999

Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record

1. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in subject member
Specifically, Petitioner requests reinstatement to 

paygrade E-6.

’s case.

indicates he was transferred to the Fleet

2. A review of the service record fo
Reserve under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) on 2 October 1996 at the
direction of the Secretary of the Navy vice administrative separation for his documented
misconduct. No request was received for reinstatement prior to his transfer to the Fleet Reserve
and no provision exists for reinstatement while in the Fleet Reserve. His case may be reviewed
for possible advancement to his highest enlisted grade held, based on the provisions of 10 USC
6334, when he is eligible to be transferred to the Retired List at the completion of 30 years total
active and inactive service, which is 22 Mar 2007.

It is recommended th

3.
denied for the reasons stated above. Enclosure (1) is returned.

petition for correction to his records be

d, Enlisted Retirements Bran



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03604-01

    Original file (03604-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08517-00

    Original file (08517-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 25 September 2001 8517-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9806586

    Original file (NC9806586.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subject member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and or remove injustices in the service record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98

    Original file (06586-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01408-01

    Original file (01408-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in subject member's case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07240-97

    Original file (07240-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner transferred to the Fleet Reserve in paygrade E-8. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, allegations of error and injustice on 30 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9806695

    Original file (NC9806695.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by granting him two more days of service, so that he will have a total of 24 years, rather than 23 years, 11 months and 28 days. Each month, all active duty service members receive a leave and earnings statement (LES) which shows their pay entry base date (PEBD). In view of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06695-98

    Original file (06695-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (I), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by granting him two more days of service, so that he will have a total of 24 years, rather than 23 years, 11 months and 28 days. Each month, all active duty service members receive a leave and earnings statement (LES) which shows their pay entry base date (PEBD). That Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02615-98

    Original file (02615-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. retirement date not be never denied leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 12_45_37 CST 2001

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 4638-99 5 October 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW 0 - - kVAL REC( Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was...