DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC:ecb
Docket No: 5276-03
28 October 2003
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 28 October 2003.
Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by HQUSMC memorandum 1000 MMEA 6 dated 1 October 2003, a copy of
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
Executive
Direc
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22
i
134-5 103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
100 0
MMEA 6
01
Ott 03
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
BCNR 5276-03; BCNR ADVISORY OPINION FOR CORRECTION OF DATE OF RANK ICO
(P
MC0
We have carefully reviewed the package for
1.
submitted a Prior Service Enlistment Program
Marine Corps Recruiting Command on 15 January 2
from the Reserve component of the Marine Corps
request is for his date of rank to be returned to the original
consideration for time in grade for the rank of sergeant during his time as a
reservist.
into the Regular Marine Corps states that Active Reserve (AR) Marines with
remaining obligated service will enter active duty at the pay grade from the
previous enlistment and that
reenlistment to active duty.
allowed to sustain one half
headquarters recommends that
P1130.80 Prior Service and Reserve Augmentation Enlistments
date of rank remain unchanged.
e the date of
PSEP request, he was
to Active Duty.
erefore, this
2.
Point of contact is Captai
at DSN 278-9238.
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps
Deputy Branch Head,
Enlisted Assignment
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06927-07
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Incase, this headquarters carefully considered that for him to be competitive for promotion to the next higher grade and furthermore, to have observed time in his new PMOS, that the date of his reenlistment on 29 April 2005 be utilized as his date of rank to sergeant. 6927-07; REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03668-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08183-00
Your request to change your sergeant date of rank to 9 October 1998 was not considered, as the Marine Corps Total Force System already reflects that date. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, they sa 9 his date of rank is MCRC; that MCRC set his date of rank as 1 Jan 95; and that unless BCNR rules otherwise, MMPR-2...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02101-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2003. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness reports: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report 13 Jul 88 9 Jan 89 Capt Capt P 880414 to 880704 (DC) 880705 to 881231 (SA) 2. The Commandant of the Marine Corps is not empowered to grant or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01228-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If Capta his date of is the date of rank he would have received upon selection from the FY02 USMC Captain Selection Board. Captain Legge requests back-dating of his date of rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05934-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,, Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05907-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. We have carefully reviewed case and provide the following comments.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10046-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC Memo 1040 M~4EA dtd 8 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06669-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2003. Sincerely, Executive Directo Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VlROlNlA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 CMT 8 Sep 03 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RESERVE AFFAIRS ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION: CASE OF COLONEL USMCR 1. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01862-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. request to with back pay,...