DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 1349-00
30 August 2000
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 August 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
and policies.
opinion furnished by the Awards and Special Projects Branch in
the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 10 April 2000,
a copy of which is enclosed.
rebuttal statement of 23 August 2000.
The Board also considered your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
In this connection, the Board substantially
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Off ICE OF
F OF NAVAL OPERATION S
THE
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
CHIf
WASHINGTON. D.C.
N
POSSO-2000
1650
N09B33/00516262
10 April 2000
Chief of Naval Operations
Chairman,
Board for Corrections of Naval Records
(NO9B33)
From:
To:
Subj:
OF
Ref:
(a) BCNR
AEG:jdh Docket
#1349-00 of 30 March 2000
In response to reference (a),
1.
was conducted by the Navy Awards Branch.
information that was provided by the letter of August 13, 1198,
the decision to upgrade the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement
Medal is not approved.
a complete review of this case
Despite the additional
Specifically,
all information provided in this case was
2.
reviewed independently of the prior decision; the outcome of the
review was that the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal was
the most appropriate award for the service and actions. I am
sorry that this is not the decision that
may be of further service,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
esired.
B. A. WILSON
By Direction
If I
.
.
__
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03435-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02672-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00095-01
Head, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NeADQUARTeRS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 134-B 103 S~BORUSSELLROAD VJRGINlA 22 OUANTICO, From: To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11C’ Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board 1. has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your Naval record. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01108-00
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0 S -_ IN...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01886-00
Removal of the following fitness reports was requested: a. b. The case is forwarded for fin Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Director Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5354 MPE ---, .i MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE NAVAL RECORDS DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj: REVIEW...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04315-00
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) in your case, dated 16 June 2000, and the advisory opinion from the HQMC Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division 25 July 2000, copies of which are attached. report. Change of Reporti etition implies a request for removal Lieutenant Colone of his failures of selection.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05613-05
As requested in reference (a), the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals (NDBDM) has reviewed petition to award her father, (deceased), a Navy and Marine Corps Medal for his actions on November 7, 1944.2.There is no evidence an award recommendation has previouslybeen submitted for and the material presented is insufficient to consider an award for him at this time. Also required is a properly completed Personal Award Recommendation Form, OPNAV 1650/3, a copy of which is provided...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07309-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07469-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 29 November 2000 and 2 January 2001, copies of which are attached. 2 Subj: ~ GUNNERY SERGEANT U~IIIIhIUBCR f. Gunnery Sergean rovides a statement in support of his request for removal of’ ‘the page 11 entry. g. Gunnery Sergean rovides documentation, a copy of a personal award, the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal he received to support his request for removal of the page 11 entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02219-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 2000. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 17 May 2000, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.