Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07309-00
Original file (07309-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS

Docket No: 7309-00
21 June 2001

 

 

aR:

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 June 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Awards Branch, Headquarters Marine
Corps, dated 25 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1650

35 APR 2001

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

 

Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER CPI. 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03975-01

    Original file (03975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) concurred with the board of generals and denied the recommendation of your former CO. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found no evidence that would warrant rcV1l. Subsequently, the Commandant determined, after reviewing the Consequently, no further action can be taken. the awarding authority, reviews, including those as provided for by Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04062-02

    Original file (04062-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record.and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the letter to and policies. including the Bronze Star Medal, However, Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense provides for the consideration of award Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, which was enacted into law on February 10, 1996, recommendations, you be able to locate your former commanding officer or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01001-02

    Original file (01001-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As required by regulations, in order for you to be considered for the award of a personal decoration, Bronze Star Medal, having personal knowledge of your actions must have submitted a recommendation for the award. your case that a recommendation was ever submitted, no further action can be taken. Combat Action Ribbon 3

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00530-01

    Original file (00530-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this connection, the Board substantially The Board will reconsider your request for the Air Medal if the 1650/3 and plane commander completes the attached OPNAV Form submits it to the Board of Decorations and Medals. Regulations that govern submission of an official recommendation require that the recommendation be signed by an "officer senior to the person being recommended. 20350-2000 NAV Y N S IN REPLY REFER TO 09B13/1U518366 Ser 29 August 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chief of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07262-05

    Original file (07262-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 4 November 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04799-06

    Original file (04799-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that only the FY 1971 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, convened on 4 August 1970, could have seen either of the contested letters, and that this promotion board could have seen only the letter dated 11 June 1970. In this regard, the Board found your record also included...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06816-07

    Original file (06816-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The administratively complete award recommendation package must consist of the following: (1) a Personal Award Recommendation (OPNAV 1650/3) (which includes the specific date(s) (day, month, and year) of Mr. Breidenbach's service) routed through his original chain of command for their review, comments, and recommendations; if all of the members of the chain of command are deceased, the recommending officer must include a signed statement indicating this fact, (2) a detailed summary of action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9806956

    Original file (NC9806956.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The citation accompanying this award reads, in part, as follows: For meritorious service while serving as Weapons Officer in (CRAIG) while operating in combat missions supporting the Republic of Vietnam from 10 April to 10 August 1965... CRAIG was assigned duties as commander of the Vietnam Naval Gunfire Support Unit from its inception until the ship’s departure from the area. At this time, the Navy and Marine Corps Awards Manual, SECNAV Instruction (SECNAVINST) P1650.1C, authorized the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07150-00

    Original file (07150-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, the award recommendation was referred to the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals for final review.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04968-00

    Original file (04968-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. of the officers and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit by requesting copies of the unit rosters for...