Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01203-00
Original file (01203-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

 

NA’/AL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100

JRE
Docket No: 1203-00
11 June 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction 
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

of your naval record pursuant to the

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 31 May 2001.
Your allegations of error and injustice
reguhitions and procedures applicable to the
were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinions furnished by the Specialty Advisor for Dermatology dated 9 November 2000 and 22
March 2001, copies of which are attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the 22 March 2001 advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

enire record, the Board found that the

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE 

PIAVY

DEPARTMENT OF 

DERMA’I OLOGY

CODE 0502

NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH

CHARElTE  HEALTH CARE 

(ZENTER

27 

EFFINGHAM 

STREI:T

PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA 

22708-2197

From:
To:

Subj:

CAPT
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records,   2 Navy
Annex, Washington, D.C.

Specialty Advisor for Dermatology

20370-5100

ON ICO FORMER

22 Mar 01

The records show that on at least two separate occasions the

1.
service member reported to have had similar oral lesions prior
to enlisting in the Navy.
documented in the dental record dated 09 Nov 88.
board states that during his hospital admission history and
physical on 09 Nov 88,
episode in the past."

One report of a previous episode was
The medical

he "revealed that he has had a similar

Following his hospitalization, an Internal Medicine clinic

2.
visit dated 28 Nov   88 reports the erythema multiforme to be
resolved.

Based on the records reviewed there 'is evidence that the

3.
erythema multiforme existed prior to entry into the Navy.
records also show that the erythema multiforme resolved and
there is no evidence of residual disability from this episode of
erythema multiforme.

The

CAPT, MC, USN

DEPARTMENT OF THE 

NAVY

DEPARTMENT OF 

DERMATC’LOGY

CODE 0502

NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH

CHARE-ITE HEALTH CARE CENTER

27 

EFRNGHAM STREET

PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA 23708-2197

09 

Nov 00

:

From 
To:

Subj 

:

CAPT
Chairman, Board  for Correction of Naval Records, 2 Navy
Annex, Washington, D.C.

Specialty Advisor for Dermatolog

20370-!jlOO

NATION ICO FORMER
iDllp 

-

1. Based on the description of the oral and ocular lesion
during the subject
associated mycoplasma pneumonia,
Erythema Multiforme major is correct.

’s hospitalization in Nov 1988 and th

I believe the diagnosis o

e

s

f

y

t

 
oral lesions 

The dental record dated 09 Nov 88

2.
had one previous episode of
The Board for Correction of Naval Records letter dated 18
states that the subject was diagnosed with Oral Herpes
Stomatitis in 1988, prior to enlistment
documentation of the Oral Herpes Stomatitis to review, it i
impossible to determine if this was in fact a case of herpes o
somet:ning  else.
a case of Erythema Multiforme or
 
some over lap in the clinical presentations of Herpes Stomatiti
and Erythema Multiforme and the
clinician can play a big role in the final diagnosis

 
experisnce of the examining

.

states that the subjec
“several years ago.

. Since there is n

fl
 

Ott 00
 

o

s

r

s

There can be

On the DD149 form,

3.
concern about his oral or ocular disease
the permanent
darnage to his lungs.
a claim of disability related to skin or mucosal disease.
not qualified to address the subject

 

the subject does not have a question or

. He is concerned about

There does not appear to be

’s claim of lung disease

 
1,a.m
.

CAPT, MC,  USN



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04859-01

    Original file (04859-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. e) MEPERS evaluation dated 26 April 2001 rendered the not have a Personality opinion that the service member does Disorder. Recommendation: There is insufficient documentation to 4. evaluate the diagnosis of Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04603-01

    Original file (04603-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01795

    Original file (PD-2013-01795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI reported flares of the skin with sun exposure only. The diagnosis was atopic (allergic rhinitis) and the examiner opined that increased temperature (rather than sunlight or ultraviolet radiation caused the rash.At a VA dermatology evaluation on 30 September 2004,a month after separation, the CI was using vitamin E lotion only, having “tried and failed”multiple treatments including oral steroids, steroid creams, antihistamines, animmunosuppressant skin cream (Elidel), and “light box...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 14 13_34_15 CST 2001

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. He noted that He The Board specifically noted In its review of your application the Board conducted a thorough review of both service and medical records, and the post-service medical records you provided. The Board also could not ignore the multiple notations With regard to your psychiatrist’s opinion that you suffered from PTSD, a paranoid personality disorder and a possible organic brain syndrome, the Board noted that like the other...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 14 14_01_05 CST 2001

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. He noted that He The Board specifically noted In its review of your application the Board conducted a thorough review of both service and medical records, and the post-service medical records you provided. The Board also could not ignore the multiple notations With regard to your psychiatrist’s opinion that you suffered from PTSD, a paranoid personality disorder and a possible organic brain syndrome, the Board noted that like the other...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05535-01

    Original file (05535-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Specialty Advisor for Pulmonary Medicine dated 6 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. The information provided in the physical examination and medical record is not sufficient to conclusively establish the diagnosis of asthma in this patient, however it does appear...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08040-99

    Original file (08040-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    18 Jan 1995: rear-ended-twice- complained of neck pain and tingling; mentioned mid and low back pain. MC, USN John C4pT. Civilian 8188 Back sprain treated at July Dee 3 care by physical therapy for “mechanical LBP ” treated with medication and requested report from civilian 17 Sept 1990 “hit from behind ” in “shoulder pain ” MVA” complaining of headache, backache and ortho (no report seen) Regarding the 17 April 1996 history and physical qualified for discharge on his final physical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06384-99

    Original file (06384-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DC 203746023 W YARD 5420 Ser: 01-01 4 Jan 2001 From: To: Subj: Director, Executive Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards Board for Correction of Naval Records REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OB , Ref: (a) Chairman, (b) SECNAVINST BCNR JRE:jdh DN: 1850.4D 6384-99 ltr of 23 Ott 00 This responds to reference (a) which requested comments and a 1. recommendation regarding petitioner's request for correction of his records to show that he was entitled to a thirty percent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00732

    Original file (PD2011-00732.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was also swelling of the ankles noted. The Board noted that the VA subsequently rated the joints individually on the 23 November 2011 decision, over 4 years after separation and considered whether there were chronic residuals at the time of separation warranting rating separate from the arthritis condition. The Board considered the final rheumatologic examination, three months prior to separation, which documented excellent control of her RA with “no signs of active synovitis”, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03714-00

    Original file (03714-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Pursuant to reference (a) a review of enclosure (1) was conducted to form opinions about the subject petitioner's claims that he suffered fiom Post Traumatic Stress Disorder at the time of his service and that this was a significant contributing factor to the misconduct that lead to his discharge. The misconduct that...