Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01323-01
Original file (01323-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

BJG
Docket No: 1323-01
28 June 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested that the entry
“cocaine abuse” be removed from your Department of Defense (DD) Form 214 (“Certificate
of Release or Discharge from Active Duty”). You asserted the reference to cocaine is
stigmatizing, and that you turned to drugs because you had been suffering from depression.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record
including your medical record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,
the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated
16 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. They noted that while block 28 (“Narrative Reason for Separation”)
of your DD Form 2 14 does refer to “drug abuse (use), 
cocaine. Even if depression did cause you to turn to drugs, this would not establish that the
stated reason for your discharge was erroneous or unjust.
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.  

’ your form makes no mention of

,
, 

In view of the above, your

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

‘

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT  OF THE NAVY

MILLINDTON  TN 

2805  

S-0000

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720  INTEGRITY DRIVE

5420
PERS-832C
16 May  01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD  

OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

FOR CORRECTION

Via:

t

PERS/BCNR  Coordinator (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

EX-H

us

Ref:

Encl:

(a) NAVMILPERSCOMINST  

1900.1B

(1) BCNR File 01323-01
(2) Petitioner's Microfiche Record

1.
The petition and naval records of subject petitioner
have been reviewed relative to her request to change the
narrative reason for separation on the DD 214.

The review reveals that petitioner went to an

2.
administrative board that found misconduct due to drug
abuse and recommended separation.
Block 28 of her DD 214 is correct in accordance with
reference (a).
Therefore,
the DD 214 as alleged in her petition.
favorable action on this petition is not recommended.

There is no mention of "cocaine abuse" on

The narrative reason in

Technical Advisor to the
Head,
Branch (PERS-832)

Enlisted Performance



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00511-01

    Original file (00511-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 5 April, 23 July and 16 August 2001, copies of which are attached. The member requests the removal of the following fitness reports. performance and making recommendations concerning promotion and assignment are the responsibilities of the reporting senior.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101210

    Original file (ND1101210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enhance employment opportunities. If members of her administrative separation board told her she would receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, they did not have the authority to say this. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00156-01

    Original file (00156-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner again requested removal of both contested fitness reports. The Board finds that Petitioner ’s failures of selection for promotion should be removed. other informal statement by another female officer claiming gender bias and the aforementioned investigation by CINCPACFLT which substantiated Lieutenant Comman II that a Therefore, based on this "preponderan climate of gender bias and perhaps discrimination existed under I recommend the first fitness report in that reporting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08710-00

    Original file (08710-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fitness report in question is a Periodic/Regular report. The fitness report itself represents the opinions of the reporting senior. Chief as petitioned for advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer due to a Fitness Report he believes to be unjust.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00463

    Original file (MD02-00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00463 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020222, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to completion of required service. This board recommended that the Respondent should be separated from the Marine Corps with an Other than Honorable Discharge by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02984-01

    Original file (02984-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The fitness report for the period 1 November 1997 to 3 1 October 1998 is a Periodic/Regular report. The report for the period 1 November 1998 to 10 July 1999 is a The member alleges the reports are erroneous and c. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05051-01

    Original file (05051-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested removal of a felony possession and distribution charge. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04368-01

    Original file (04368-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    request for the By enclosure 3. a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained at (3), this Headquarters provide encl ith Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ,._iDQUARTERS UNITLD STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 2 1 MAY 2001 From: To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11C Per the reference, 1. has reviewed allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03461-05

    Original file (03461-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    03461-05 4 April 2006 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD R Ref: (a) 10 U.S~C. 3 (1) Block 20: Change from “MINS” to “PINS.” (2) Block 43 *36: Change to read “- [PFA] Results: APR 03 P/NS (1st failure) and OCT 03 P/NS (2nd failure) CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting partial relief, specifically, the requested correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08041-00

    Original file (08041-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The member provided a copy of her statement and reporting senior’s endorsement with her petition. When the member’s statement and reporting senior’s endorsement is returned and found suitable for filing, we will place it in the member’s digitized record.