DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 186-01
18 December 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
1400/3 MMPR 2 of 30 November 2001, a copy of
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221343104
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1400/3
MMPR-2
30 Nov 01
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj
:
ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF M
Ref:
(a) Mr.
DD Form of 9 Jan 01 w/attachments
’
1.
corrected to corporal.
for promotion but he was not awarded the promotion.
He states that he passed a
quests that his rank of lance corporal be
"GMST" test
A review of
‘GMST test" for promotion to corporal.
m service records indicate that he
2.
passed the
be promoted, he was required to be recommended for promotion.
There is not sufficient enough information or official documents
for us to determine if he was recommended for promotion to
corporal.
at the highest rank he held, a lance corporal.
as honorably discharged 9 December 1969
In order to
Major, U. S. Marine Corps
Head, Enlisted Promotion Section
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03939-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, considered your application on 14 May 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is demonstrate the existence of probable material error or upon submission of new and material In this regard, it is important ili_justice. , a former...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05759-07
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Based on the information above, passing the GMST is only one of the qualifying factors for a Marine to be promoted to the rank of staff sergeant. Furthermore, reference (b) also verifies that became qualified for promotion to staff sergeant on 28 December 1954.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05874-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 13 August 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08715-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09007-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2 The record of examination for promotion section of reference (b) show no evidence tha qian 2s sed any military...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07140-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03951-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. request contains two prior service with the same date phonecon with Per a time of was discharged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02755-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) states the requirements for promotion to the rank of corporal were as follows: (1) Complete the minimum time in grade/time in service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04832-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03636-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 19 July 1999, a copy of which is attached. Per paragraph 1204.3 of reference (b), it states that the assignment to weight control is a promotion restriction, therefore he was not eligible for...