Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00028-01
Original file (00028-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TJR
Docket No: 28-01
22 June 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

Ref:

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure
(1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
characterization of his discharge be changed.

The Board, consisting of Mr.  

Leeman, Ms. McCormick, and Ms.
2.
Wiley, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in a

timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 30 October  

age of 21.
At that time, he had completed 12 years of formal
education and attained test scores which placed him in Mental
Group III

1974.at the

d.

During Petitioner's enlistment,

any disciplinary actions.

he was not the subject of

On 

17 June 1975, after undergoing a psychiatric

e.

evaluation, Petitioner was diagnosed with a character and
behavior disorder and an immature personality.
evaluation, Petitioner reported that prior to his enlistment in
the Navy, he had taken several enlistment examinations for entry
into the Armed Forces and that since his enlistment he had
problems with other Sailors.
follows:

The report noted, in part, as

During this

. 

. 

also reports taking the Air Force

. states that he took the exam for the regular Army x4 but

. 
failed to pass....
qualification exam x2 and the Navy x2....
accepted him.... states that people make fun of him on board
ship and that he is called a retard and this angers him....
states that he did not feel he could adjust to shipboard
life.... reports difficulty getting to sleep and occasional
nocturnal awakenings.... reports fleeting and weak suicidal
ideations.

Navy finally

He appears to be of low average to borderline intelligence.
This (Patient) does not appear to have the necessary
educational, cultural, personal,
adjust to the stresses of Naval Service.

or emotional (illegible) to

f.

On 25 July 1975 Petitioner was issued a general discharge

under honorable conditions by reason of unsuitability due to a
character and behavior disorder.
Petitioner's conduct and overall traits averages of 2.8 was below
the average marks of 3.0 and 2.7 which were required for a fully
honorable characterization of service.
noted that these averages were computed from a single set of
marks assigned on the date of his discharge.

At the time of his discharge

However, it should be

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.

In this regard, the Board notes the

The Board's finding is based on Petitioner's apparent inability
to succeed in the Navy and the fact that he received no
disciplinary actions.
comments of the psychologist to the effect that despite his test
scores to the contrary, Petitioner's mental capacity was very
limited, and arguably should not have been enlisted.
Additionally,, he had no disciplinary problems during his'period
of service.
were substandard, they were based on only one set of marks which
were assigned after discharge had been directed and he was
practically

Finally, although his conduct and overall traits

'out of the door.'

2

Based on the foregoing the Board concludes that no useful purpose
is served by continuing to characterize Petitioner's service as
having been under honorable conditions, and recharacterization to
Accordingly, the
a fully honorable discharge is appropriate.
Board concludes that relief in the form of recharacterization of
Petitioner's discharge is appropriate.

In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.

the Board finds the existence of an

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that

he was honorably discharged on 25 July 1975 vice the general
discharge under honorable conditions on the same day.

b.

That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating

to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

C .

That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's

naval record be returned to the Board,
this Report of Proceedings,
maintained for such purpose,
part of Petitioner's naval record.

together with a copy of

for retention in a confidential file
with no cross reference being made a

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

&
& E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07775-99

    Original file (07775-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    7775-99 10 March 1999 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Secretary Board for Correction of Naval Records of the Navy REVIEW OF _ NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03925-07

    Original file (03925-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 October 1969, a service record entry was made, which stated that he was being transferred to the nearest separation activity for separation. Regulations in effect at that time authorized assignment of evaluation marks upon discharge if 90 or more days of the current reporting period had elapsed. Averages of 2.7 in overall trait and 3.0 in military behavior were required for a fully honorable characterization of service.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03363-01

    Original file (03363-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3363-01 12 October 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: Encl: (a) (1) (2) (3) 10 U.S.C.1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments Case Summary Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the general discharge issued on 21...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10126-02

    Original file (10126-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS I 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 FC Document No: 10126- 02 28 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF iUmUINII~IIflIfhIhIIIIEUiIIiihhjUIhii~iiqimU~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Petitioner’s conduct and overall trait averages were 3.25 and 3.2 respectively at the time of his discharge. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02156-08

    Original file (02156-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 2156-08 27 October 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF =i Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Apparently, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07171-00

    Original file (07171-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board also notes that even though Petitioner's trait averages differ on his enlisted performance record and his performance evaluation, both marks exceed the required average of 2.0 which is needed for a The Board further fully honorable characterization of service. notes Petitioner's only performance evaluation of record in which he was recommended for retention and promotion and believes that the sole reason for separation was due to him being nondeployable because he could not find...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01412-01

    Original file (01412-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 SECNAVINST 1910.4B DD Form 149 with attachments Case Summary Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. reference states that individuals separated for homosexuality will receive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06600-00

    Original file (06600-00.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 31 August. In this regard, the majority notes that his conduct mark average was sufficient for an honorable discharge, despite his four disciplinary actions. MINORITY CONCLUSION: Mr. Beckett disagrees with the majority and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02191-05

    Original file (02191-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 2191-05 19 October 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04475-08

    Original file (04475-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 4475-08 6 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. On 11 August 1988, the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she was...