Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06191-01
Original file (06191-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BJG
Docket No: 6191-01
17 August 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

GYSG
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

USM

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 dtd 27 Jun 01 w/attachments
w/encl
(2) HQMC PERB memo dtd 2 Aug 01 
(3) MCRC memo dtd 23 Jul 01
(4) Subject’s naval record

(2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC)

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the fitness report for 15 March to 14 August 2000, a copy of which is
at enclosure (1). As indicated in enclosure 
Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed removal of the contested fitness
report, which documented Petitioner’s relief for cause (RFC) from recruiting duty. He also
requested removal of the draw case signal code “AM” (relieved SDA (special duty
assignment)/career planner) from his service tour data file in the Marine Corps Total Force
(MMEA) has removed this code. Finally,
System. The HQMC Enlisted Assignment Branch 
he impliedly requested that his record be corrected by removing all other documentation of
his RFC; showing that he was not removed from recruiter duty before the end of his tour;
reinstating his 8411 recruiter military occupational specialty 
(MOS); and showing that his
entitlement to SDA pay was not terminated on 20 March 2000. Copies of documents in his
Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) concerning his RFC are at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. 
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 August 2001, and pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Novello and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed

Mazza and 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

In correspondence attached as enclosure 

has commented to the effect that Petitioner
has merit and warrants favorable action.

(3), the Marine Corps Recruiting Command
’s request to remove documentation

of his RFC

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosures (2) and 
(3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting
the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s record be corrected by removing all documentation of his RFC

from recruiting duty, to include the documents on his OMPF fiche S, row F, frames 7-14
and row G, frames 1 and 2.

_

b. That his record be corrected further to show that he was not removed from

recruiting duty before the end of his tour.

c. That his record be corrected further by reinstating his 8411 recruiter MOS.

d; That his record be corrected further to show his entitlement to SDA pay was not

terminated on 20 March 2000.

e.

That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board

recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner
that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

’s

’s record and

f. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner

’s naval record be returned

to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner ’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. 
Recorder

ZSALMAN

$sTvLL&J
JONATHAN S. 
,Acting Recorder

2

4  

 
# 
RUSKIN

/ q&&&L

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280 RUSSELL

  ROA D

QUANTICO,  VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0

3

IN 

“‘P’~f,ER  TO:

MMER
2 Aug 01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
S

NAVAL RECORD

Subi:

2

BCNR APPLICATION

IN

THL,.CASE

OF GUNNERY

'USMC

SERGEANT

Encl:

 Copy of CMC

 1610  
(1)
(2) MCRC Advisory Opinion 1610 G-l of 23 Jul 01

ltr

 

MMER/PERB

 of  

2 Aug 

01

As evidenced by enclosure

1.
Sergean
the period 000315 to 000814 (TR).

 
ficial

(l),
 military record,

PERB removed from Gunnery

the fitness report for

fer to BCNR on the issue concerning Gunnery Sergeant
quest for removal of the Relief for Cause package.

(2) is furnished to assist in resolving that matter.

the Enlisted Assignment Branch (MMEA)

"AM" code from Gunnery

As a point of information,
of thi
Sergea

s is eliminating the
vice Tour Data File.

Performance Evaluation

Head,
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
Manpower and Reserve Affairs
Department
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y
UNITED  STATES MARINE CORPS

HEADQUARTERS 

3280 RUSSELL ROAD

QUANTICO. VIRGINIA

 

22134-5103

From: C
To:

O

Subj:

Ref:

CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

(a) 

MC0

 

1610.11~

 

TO:

IN REPLY REFER

1610
MMER/PERB
AU62001

2 

Per the reference,

1.
has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your Naval
record.
directed that your Naval record will be
therefrom the following fitness report:

Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has

the Performance Evaluation Review Board

corrected by removing

Date of Report

14 Aug 00

Reporting Senior

Period of Report

000315  to  000814  (TR)

The memorandum will contain

There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in

2.
place of the removed report.
appropriate identifying data concerning the report and state
that it has been removed by direction of the Commandant of the
Marine Corps and cannot be made available in any form to
selection boards and reviewing authorities.
that such boards may not conjecture or draw any inference as to
the nature of the report or the events which may have
precipitated them,
part of the official record.
System (the data base which generates your Master Brief Sheet)
will be corrected accordingly.

unless such events are otherwise 

It will also state

properly a

The Automated Fitness Report

Since the remainder of your requests do not fall

3.
purview of this Headquarters,
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) for final
resolutio
that agen

 
your case is being forwarded to

within.the

e directly to

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS RECRUITING COMMAND

3280 RUSSELL 

ROAD

QUANTICO,

VA 22134-5103

IN REPLY REFER TO:

161 0
G- l
Jul
23 

 01

MEMOIiANDUM

 FOR THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD

Subj

Ref:

(a) 

MMER r/s of 29 Jul 01

Per the reference, we were asked to

1.
petition for correction of his military
there is sufficient evidence to support
requested.

THE CASE OF GUNNERY  
MC

SERGEAN

review Gunnery 
record.
amending the record, as

After review,

Sergean

Gunnery Serge

2 .
during March
screening.
court-martial.

2000,

relieved for cause from recruiting duty,

on the positive results of a urinalysis

At the time he was relieved, he was pending trial by special

In light of his subsequent acquittal at trial, we believe

to remove the relief for cause package from Gunnery
fficial

 Military Personnel File.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05473-00

    Original file (05473-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    (6), the M arine Corps Recruiting Command ’s request to remove his page 11 entry should be MOS , and 2 In correspondence attached as enclosure (7), the HQMC Enlisted Assignment Branch (MI&A) has also commented to the effect that Petitioner ’s request to remove his page 11 entry should be approved, but his requests concerning his RFC should be denied. Point of contact is M ecommended that the Board equest for removal of the VMC 118(11), page 11 .entry dated Acting Head, Field Support...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04133-01

    Original file (04133-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Copies of RFC documents appearing in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) are at Tab B. removal of the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 17 April 1996, a copy of which is at Tab C, as he says it resulted from the fitness report. He provides his rebuttal of 17 April 1996 to the page 11 entry, and he states that he does not know why it is not in his record. The Board for Correction of Naval Records disapprove request for removal of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01263-01

    Original file (01263-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lb (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 23 February 2000. The Automated n Since your request to remove the Page 11 entry does not 3. fall under the purview of this Headquarters, your case will be forwarded to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) for resolution 0 to that agency a lease direct further inquiries HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07838-10

    Original file (07838-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    JAMS stated that the NUP “stemmed from [Petitioner’s] failure to report a civilian DUI arrest,” however, the UPB entry actually says he was punished “for failing to notify his command of his DUI conviction [emphasis added] .” JAM5 noted that “the requirement to report the conviction (rather than the arrest) is lawful.” d. Enclosure (4) explains that PERB directed removing the contested fitness report in light of enclosure (3). e. In enclosure (5), the Marine Corps Recruiting Command (MCRC)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02280 12

    Original file (02280 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2009, a copy of which is at Tab A. That his record be corrected further to restore his AMOS of 8411. c. That his record be corrected further to show his entitlement to SDA pay for 21 July 2010 to 13 June...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03925-04

    Original file (03925-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the fitness reports for 1 January to 1 April 2002, 2 April to 22 June 2002, 23 June to31 December 2002, 1 January to 30 June 2003, and 1 July to26 August 2003. We do not, however, recommend that his voided MOS 8411 be reinstated and the recoupment of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5624 14

    Original file (NR5624 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to its regulations, the Board determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. His transfer fitness report from RS Harrisburg, for 1 January to 13 July 2013 (copy at enclosure (1)), was fully favorable, even though the reporting senior, the Commanding Officer (CO), RS Harrisburg, requested Petitioner’s RFC on 12 April 2013, and the reviewing officer, the CO, First Marine Corps District, favorably endorsed the request on 26...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02442-01

    Original file (02442-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 1997 to 26 March 1998. MC0 authorizes commanders to make entries on page 11 P1070.12H, Marine Corps Individual Records Administration (IRAM), 2. We defer comments/opinions and recommendations on Gunnery request for removal from his medical records o...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2716 13

    Original file (NR2716 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 20 February 2007 (copy at Tab A) and all documentation of his relief for cause (RFC) from duty as a canvassing recruiter (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Chapman and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08387-01

    Original file (08387-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Petitioner denied that the applicant Petitioner was offered, and he accepted, NJP. Analysis a. Petitioner claims that his NJP was unjust because he believes the preliminary inquiry into his misconduct contained "inconsistencies" a statement Petitioner made at the NJP. The record of the NJP reveals that the NJP was just.