Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04398-98
Original file (04398-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

TRG
Docket No: 4398-98
28 April 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

Your allegations of error and

A three-member panel   of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 April 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
and policies.
opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated  
1998 and 2 March 1999, copies of which are enclosed and your
rebuttal to the first advisory opinion,
Board on 9 December 1998.

28&October

which was received by the

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

In this connection, the Board substantially

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280RUSSELL  ROAD

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22

 

134-5  103

\:

IN REPLY REFER TO:
1650
MMMA-3
1998

OCT  28 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR  CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Subj:

THE CASE OF

Ref:

(a) 

SecNavInst 

1650.1F

Waiver of this requirements are

As stated in the criteria, commanding officers

The reference contains the criteria for the Arctic Service

1.
Ribbon which requires 28 days (consecutive or non-consecutive)
duty above the Arctic Circle.
not authorized.
will determine a Marine's eligibility by certifying his/her
The
participation in operations above the Arctic Circle.
The ribbon
commencement date for this award is 1 January 1982.
is authorized based upon a 2 for 1 count, provided that such duty
is an austere remote site over water,
the minimum conveniences of water, heat, or electricity.
Marine Corps personnel must meet the same criteria whether active
is incorrect in his
duty or reserve.
statement that reserves were authorized the award for 15 days,
unless those personnel meet the 2 for 1 day requirement as stated
above.

without accessibility to
All

Staff Sergeant,

2.
1988, he went on active training duty to Norway and returned on
25 September 1988.
while in Norway he served above the Arctic Circle.

However, the records fail to reveal that

DEPARTMENT OF THE

 

NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280RUssrLLR0~D

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

  22 

134-S 103

IN  

REPLY

 

REFER

 TO:
1650
MMMA-3
WV?  2  

1999

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Subj:

Ref:

(a) 

SecNavInst 

1650.1F

OF

.

e documents provided does not establish that
served above the Arctic Circle for a period

(consecutive or nonconsecutive) as required by the criteria
contained in the reference.

.

Our previous comments of 28 October 1998, on the

2.
Marine remains.

subject

 Management 

l

Personne
By direction of
the Commandant of the 

Division

Marine 

Corps



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-01

    Original file (06639-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Copies of these replies are forwarded as Enclosure (3) is a copy of a letter forwarded 1993 regarding his entitlement to (1) and (2) _ During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple Heart 2. was authorized for award to those who were wounded or injured as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United States or an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United States was engaged. and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03975-01

    Original file (03975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) concurred with the board of generals and denied the recommendation of your former CO. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found no evidence that would warrant rcV1l. Subsequently, the Commandant determined, after reviewing the Consequently, no further action can be taken. the awarding authority, reviews, including those as provided for by Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02593-02

    Original file (02593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Our most recent reply is the Purple Heart Medal is not awarded for Combat Without the required two eyewitness statements to forwarded as enclosure (2). if he can provide the required two As previously stated, records fail to Without these : _. . ’ served in the Marine Corps, the During the perio Purple Heart was authorized for award to those who were wounded .as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United or injured States or an opposing armed force of a foreign county in which the.Armed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07949-99

    Original file (07949-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Military Awards Branch, Headquarters, Marine Corps, dated 27 April 2000, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10969-07

    Original file (10969-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 24 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09

    Original file (06987-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01

    Original file (05890-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08175-00

    Original file (08175-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Awards Branch, Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 1 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Review of he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05668-01

    Original file (05668-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, regulations and policies. VIRGINIA 22 134-6 103 S TO: IN REPLY.REFER 1650 MMMA-3 llDecO1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECT1 NAVAL RECORDS 3R, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF (BCNR) Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION FORMER MARINE Upon review of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07954-07

    Original file (07954-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, he is not entitled to a Purple Heart award. We realize how important this award is to him, but without official documentation, there is no further action that can be taken.