Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02871-98
Original file (02871-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TJR
Docket No: 2871-98
23 March 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 March 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Your record reflects that on 12 April 1985 you

The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 14 August 1984 at the
age of 18.
received nonjudicial punishment for failure to obey a lawful
order.
restriction and extra duty for 14 days.
and extra duty was suspended for three months.

The punishment imposed was forfeitures totalling $75 and

Half of the restriction

Your record further reflects that on 17 April 1985, after
undergoing a medical and psychiatric examination, you were
diagnosed with pneumonia and a conversion disorder.
you were referred to a medical board.
board also diagnosed you with a conversion disorder, which
existed prior to your enlistment,
and recommended you be
administratively separated.
apparently manifested itself to stress you were undergoing at
that time.
authority directed your commanding officer to honorably discharge
you by reason of physical disability.
so discharged and assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code.

Subsequently, on 13 June 1985, the discharge

The Board noted that the disorder

At this time
On 25 April 1985 a medical

On 27 August 1985 you were

1

The Board, in its review of your entire record, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable
service and your contention that you would like your reenlistment
The Board further considered your contention that
code changed.
you do not have any sort of disorder that would prevent you from
serving in a branch of the armed forces as a reservist.
the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
a change in your reenlistment code given the diagnosed conversion
disorder.
which noted, in part, that "personality test scores and clinical
history/ observation failed to rule out the possibility of a
future occurrence of conversion disorder or a related disorder."

The Board also considered the psychologist's report

However,

The Board noted that the conversion disorder

Given all the circumstances in your case, the Board concluded
issued and no change is
your reenlistment code was proper as
warranted.
apparently became symptomatic only under stress.
no such stress existed when you consulted the civilian
psychologist, who seems to have taken this into account when he
opined that the disorder might recur in the future.
your application has been denied.

It appears that

Accordingly,

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00709-01

    Original file (00709-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner. However, the Board notes that even if she does not have a personality disorder, she was still having difficulties that should be considered in any future security clearance determination. warranted, the Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the circumstances which led to her discharge on 13 May 1999, and the rationale for the Board's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07721-09

    Original file (07721-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You had no military status during the period from 26 June 1979 to 19 December 1988. , The Board considered your application and all pertinent records in accordance with the provisions of SECNAV Instruction 5420.193, enclosure (1), Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (codified at 32 CFR 723), paragraph 3e. During the 1979-1989 period, you received treatment from VA health care providers for multiple conditions such as hip, back and knee pain, chronic recurrent foot pain,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07743-98

    Original file (07743-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the performance evaluation for You were Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder. evaluations and the psychologist's opinion that you could be at risk to harm yourself or others were sufficient to support the decision not to recommend you for reenlistment and to assign you an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07614-10

    Original file (07614-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11176-06

    Original file (11176-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 November 2002 at age 20. After review, a clinical psychologist...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01675-01

    Original file (01675-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    that you seek treatment for the post traumatic stress disorder from the Department of Veterans Affairs following your separation. You were discharged from the Navy on 16 April 1992 by reason of CONDITIONS You underwent a pre-separation physical - PERSONALITY DISORDERS ”. “OTHER PHYSICAL/MENTAL In his opinion, He also recommended The fact that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder during your naval service was not considered probative of the existence of material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07064-00

    Original file (07064-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2001. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2. Review of available Navy medical records revealed: a.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08335-01

    Original file (08335-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, changes in his reason for separation and reenlistment code. In support of that request, he submitted the 1999 psychological assessment. However, in 1995, while in the navy, Petitioner's records do support the in-service diagnosis of personality disorder for the reasons noted above.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05913-01

    Original file (05913-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your reported history suggested a You were diagnosed with an mala- self- On 25 February 1999 you received a general discharge by reason of the diagnosed personality disorder, reenlistment code. The discharge processing documentation is not and were assigned an RE-4 The Board also noted that the Navy views The Board noted the statement in support of your Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02561-98

    Original file (02561-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fact that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted you service connection for post traumatic stress disorder in 1997, effective from 23 August 1994, was not considered probative of error or injustice in your naval record. prior to your discharge were related to a personality disorder, which is a condition not covered by the military disability evaluation system, rather than a physical disability. It appears likely that the diagnosis made with all information would be PTSD and...