Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-107
Original file (2003-107.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2003-107 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

 

 

The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years 
after he was advanced to E-5 on May 1, 2003.  He stated that because he reenlisted on the same 
day he was advanced, he received his Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) based on the 
pay of an E-4.  He alleged that he was told he would receive the SRB based on his new, higher 
pay grade.  His record shows that his prior enlistment was ending on May 31, 2003, and that a 
4-month extension would have become operative on June 1, 2003, if he had not reenlisted. 
 

The  Chief  Counsel  of  the  Coast  Guard  recommended  that  the  Board  grant  relief  by 
changing  the  applicant’s  reenlistment  date  to  May  2,  2003,  because  the  record  supports  his 
allegation that he was not properly counseled. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Under Chapter 3.C. of the Personnel Manual, the applicant was entitled to counseling 
concerning his SRB eligibility.  If he had been properly counseled, he would not have reenlisted 
on the day that he was advanced because SRBs are based on the member’s pay grade on the 
day before they reenlist.  In addition, the Board notes that the applicant’s enlistment was not 
ending  until  May  31,  2003.    If  the  applicant  had  been  properly  counseled,  he  would  have 
known that the month remaining on his prior enlistment would count as previously obligated 
service  and  diminish  the  size  of  his  SRB.    The  Board  finds  that  if  the  applicant  had  been 
properly  counseled,  he  would  have  canceled  the  extension and reenlisted on June 1, 2003, to 
receive the maximum Zone B SRB for his rating under ALCOAST 329/02.  Accordingly, relief 
should be granted.   

 

ORDER 

 

 
 

 
 

The military record of FS2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, shall be corrected to show 
that he canceled his 4-month extension and reenlisted for 6 years on June 1, 2003, instead of on 
May 1, 2003.  The Coast Guard shall pay him the amount due as a result of this correction. 
 
 
January 16, 2004 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Felisa C. Garmon 

 
 
 Julia Andrews 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Dorothy J. Ulmer 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-090

    Original file (2002-090.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated February 4, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record by canceling two short-term extension contracts and reenlisting him for four years as of January 20, 2002, to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 under ALCOAST 127/01. of the Personnel Manual provides that, in deciding whether to recommend a member for advancement, “the rating chain must consider...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-113

    Original file (2002-113.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    How- ever, he was still in pay grade E-4 in January 2002, so he was not eligible for and did not receive the SRB he was promised. On November 29, 2002, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s request because the record supports his allegations. The extension would have ended on February 5, 2003, by which date he had been advanced to pay grade E-5 and was eligible for a Zone B SRB under ALCOAST 329/02.

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-156

    Original file (2004-156.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated March 31, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, an operations specialist second class (OS2), asked the Board to correct his military record to make him entitled to a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with a multiple of 2.1 He alleged that, prior to being transferred to his current station on July 7, 2003, he was not properly counseled about his eligibility for an SRB when he signed a...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-112

    Original file (2004-112.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the Personnel Manual provides that extension contracts for terms of two years or less may be canceled prior to their operative dates to allow the member to sign a new, longer extension or reenlistment contract to receive an SRB. of the Personnel Manual, the applicant could have canceled his May 6, 2003, three-year extension contract by signing a six-year reenlistment contract on July 18, 2004, to obtain a Zone A SRB under ALCOAST 182/03. Canceling the extension contract will reduce the...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-039

    Original file (2004-039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 6 but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Article 3.C., Coast Guard Personnel Manual. If the applicant had been properly counseled, it would be reasonable to assume that he would have extended for one (01) year to meet the obligated service requirement to accept his orders and prior to the effective date of the extension [July 11, 2003] he would have reenlisted for the Zone B SRB multiple of [2.5] that he was promised. The...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-145

    Original file (2004-145.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s reenlistment contract further indicates the applicant was “obligating 48 new months for SRB purposes.” There is also a Career Intentions Worksheet in the record dated January 13, 2004, which contains a handwritten notation from the person administering the oath for the applicant’s reenlistment, which states “cancel extension that is to begin 07 Feb 04, reenlisting for SRB purposes.” The record also contains a memorandum dated June 17, 2004, submitted by a yeoman first class...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-064

    Original file (2005-064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the Coast Guard Personnel Manual states that to receive a Zone A SRB, the member cannot have previously received a Zone A SRB. The counseling was erroneous because the applicant received a Zone A SRB for his September 22, 2001, reenlistment, and pursuant to Article 3.C.4.a.6. Therefore, the Board finds that if the applicant had received proper SRB counseling in accordance with Article 3.C.3., he would have (a) extended his enlistment for 23 months instead of reenlisting in July 2003 and...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-108

    Original file (2003-108.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By that time, ALCOAST 182/03 was in effect and the SRB multiple for MK2s in Zone A was just 1.5.5 In support of his allegations, the applicant pointed out that his command failed to have him sign a CG-3307 (“page 7”) to acknowledge receiving proper SRB counseling when he signed the one-year extension contract on November 18, 2002. Therefore, the Board finds that the applicant has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was miscounseled in November 2002 that, if he extended...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-020

    Original file (2003-020.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 21 months but no more than 6 years of active duty service are in “Zone A.” Members who have completed at least 6 years but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Members may not receive more than one bonus per zone. On July 1, 1999, after receiving transfer orders to a new station, the applicant was advised that an SRB multiple was authorized for his rating and that if he reenlisted or extended his enlistment for at least three...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-001

    Original file (2003-001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 19, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to make him entitled to a full Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 based on his pay grade as an MK2, rather than a partial SRB reduced by previously obligated service under an extension contract. of the Personnel Manual provides that members with less than six years of active duty will not normally be...