Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-113
Original file (2002-113.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
xxxxxxxxxxxx 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2002-113 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

 

 

ANDREWS, Deputy Chair: 
 

The  applicant  asked  the  Board  to  correct  his  record  by  voiding  a  6-year  reenlistment 
contract  that  he  signed  on  January  3,  2002,  and  reinstating  a  13-month  extension  to  his  first 
enlistment  that  would  have  gone  into  effect  on  January  6,  2002.    The  extension  contract  was 
canceled when he reenlisted.  He alleged that he canceled the extension and reenlisted because 
he was promised a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) under ALCOAST 127/01.  How-
ever, he was still in pay grade E-4 in January 2002, so he was not eligible for and did not receive 
the SRB he was promised.  His record contains an administrative entry showing that he was 
erroneously  promised  the  SRB,  and  he  submitted  two  statements  from  his  command 
supporting his claim. 
 

On  November  29,  2002,  the  Chief  Counsel  of  the  Coast  Guard  recommended  that  the 

Board grant the applicant’s request because the record supports his allegations. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Under  COMDTINST  7220.33,  the  applicant  was  entitled  to  proper  counseling 
concerning his eligibility for an SRB.  He has proved that he was not properly counseled and 
that,  if  he  had  been,  he  would  not  have  reenlisted  or  canceled  his  extension.    The  extension 
would have ended on February 5, 2003, by which date he had been advanced to pay grade E-5 
and  was  eligible  for  a  Zone  B  SRB  under  ALCOAST  329/02.  Accordingly,  relief  should  be 
granted.   

 

 
 
 

ORDER 

The  military  record  of  GM2  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  USCG,  shall  be  corrected  by  voiding 
his reenlistment dated January 3, 2002, and reinstating his 13-month extension from January 6, 
2002, through February 5, 2003.  His record shall further be corrected to show that on February 
6,  2003,  he  reenlisted  for  3,  4,  5,  or 6 years, at his sole discretion, to receive a Zone B SRB in 
accordance with ALCOAST 329/02.  The Coast Guard shall pay him the amount due as a result 
of this correction. 

 

 
February 27, 2003 
Date 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 John A. Kern 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 James G. Parks 

 

 
 Coleman R. Sachs 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-020

    Original file (2003-020.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 21 months but no more than 6 years of active duty service are in “Zone A.” Members who have completed at least 6 years but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Members may not receive more than one bonus per zone. On July 1, 1999, after receiving transfer orders to a new station, the applicant was advised that an SRB multiple was authorized for his rating and that if he reenlisted or extended his enlistment for at least three...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-097

    Original file (2002-097.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He recommended that the Board void the applicant's March 22, 2002 reenlistment contract and reinstate his extension of enlistment due to expire on May 26, 2003. At his option, the applicant's reenlistment contract dated March 22, 2002 shall be corrected to show that he reenlisted on March 22, 2003 for 5 or 6 years. His record shall be further corrected to show that he is eligible to receive a Zone B SRB under ALCOAST 329/02.

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-156

    Original file (2004-156.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated March 31, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, an operations specialist second class (OS2), asked the Board to correct his military record to make him entitled to a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with a multiple of 2.1 He alleged that, prior to being transferred to his current station on July 7, 2003, he was not properly counseled about his eligibility for an SRB when he signed a...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-079

    Original file (2004-079.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated November 12, 2004, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he is entitled to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with a multiple of 3.5, instead of the multiple of 2.5 that he received for signing a six-year reenlistment contract on March 21, 2004. When he executed the extension contract, the applicant was counseled that he was eligible to receive a Zone B SRB with...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-039

    Original file (2004-039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 6 but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Article 3.C., Coast Guard Personnel Manual. If the applicant had been properly counseled, it would be reasonable to assume that he would have extended for one (01) year to meet the obligated service requirement to accept his orders and prior to the effective date of the extension [July 11, 2003] he would have reenlisted for the Zone B SRB multiple of [2.5] that he was promised. The...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-065

    Original file (2004-065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Personnel Command denied the applicant’s request for an extension pursuant to COMDINST 7220.33.2 The applicant also alleged that if evidence of his successful completion of the Navigation Rules examination (NAVRULS) had been placed in his military record prior to his reenlistment, then he would have been eligible for an SRB multiple of 2 under ALCOAST 182/03. If the applicant had been told on April 29, 2003, that his request for a one- month extension was denied, he would have...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2009-117

    Original file (2009-117.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Coast Guard erred when it counseled the applicant that he was eligible to receive a Zone B SRB for signing a six-year reenlistment contract on January 31, 2002. of the Personnel Manual, which show that a member’s SRB equals his monthly basic pay, multiplied by the SRB multiple authorized under the ALCOAST in effect, multiplied the number of months of service newly obligated under the contract, and divided by 12, if the appli- cant had reenlisted for four years on this 6th anniversary...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-154

    Original file (2004-154.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant alleged that when he signed a six-year extension contract on May 1, 2003, he was counseled that he would receive an SRB with a multiple of 2.5. The Board also finds that if the applicant had been properly counseled at the time of his May 1, 2003, reenlistment, he would have had the following options: Reenlist as he did for an SRB with a multiple of 2.0 under ALCOAST 329/02; a. b. c. Be discharged from the Coast Guard. of the Personnel Manual, and at the termination of said...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-066

    Original file (2004-066.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated October 13, 2004, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was entitled to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with a multiple of 1.5, instead of the multiple of 1 which he received for signing a four-year extension contract on April 25, 2003. However, this ALCOAST was not in effect on the day the applicant signed the extension contract. Article 3.C.6...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-026

    Original file (2004-026.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 21 months but no more than 6 years of active duty service are in “Zone A.” Article 3.C., Coast Guard Personnel Manual. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Coast Guard Personnel Manual Article 3.C.3 (Written Agreements) states that "all personnel with 10 years or less active service who reenlist or extend for any period, however brief, shall be counseled on the SRB program." However, when he reenlisted, he was incorrectly advised by Coast Guard personnel that he was...