IN THE CASE OF: Ms.
BOARD DATE: 22 May 2013
CASE NUMBER: AR20130005664
___________________________________________________________________________
Board Determination and Directed Action
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
Presiding Officer
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.
THE APPLICANTS REQUEST AND STATEMENT:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to honorable.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that she was discharged during basic training for an adjustment disorder but she feels much better now and would like to reenlist and serve again.
DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:
a. Application Receipt Date: 18 March 2013
b. Discharge received: Uncharacterized
c. Date of Discharge: 19 Novemberr 2010
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Condition, Not a Disability, AR 635-200, Chapter 5-17, JFV, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment: B Co, 2d Bn, 13th Infantry Rgt, Fort Jackson, SC
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 4 October 2010, 4 years and 23 weeks
g. Current Enlistment Service: 0 years, 1 month, 16 days
h. Total Service: 0 years, 1 month, 16 days
i. Time Lost: None
j. Previous Discharges: None
k. Highest Grade Achieved: E-2
l. Military Occupational Specialty: None
m. GT Score: 99
n. Education: HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service: None
p. Combat Service: None
q. Decorations/Awards: None
r. Administrative Separation Board: No
s. Performance Ratings: None
t. Counseling Statements: None
u. Prior Board Review: No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 2010, for a period of 4 years and 23 weeks. She was 24 years old at the time of entry and was a high school graduate. Her record does not show any acts of valor or significant achievements. At the time of her discharge she was undergoing basic combat training at Fort Jackson, SC.
SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
1. The evidence contained in the applicants record indicates that on 11 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, not a disability, specifically for having been diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood.
2. The unit commander recommended an entry level discharge with service uncharacterized and advised the applicant of her rights.
3. On 11 November 2010, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement on her behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of with an uncharacterized discharge.
4. On 16 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with an uncharacterized separation of service.
5. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 19 November 2010, with a characterization of service listed as uncharacterized.
6. The applicants service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD
The record does not contain any violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice or any negative counseling statements.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT
The applicant provided a doctors letter and three character reference letters.
POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY:
None provided with the application.
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
1. Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.
2. AR 635-200, paragraph 5-1, states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
1. The applicants request for an upgrade of the characterization of her discharge was carefully considered. However, after a careful review of all the available records for the period of enlistment under review and the issues submitted with the application, there were insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in training status, was diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood, a condition which was incompatible with military service. It was determined that this condition interfered with her ability to perform her duties and to properly function in the military environment.
3. The applicants service was uncharacterized because she was in entry-level status. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. AR 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
4. For a Soldier in entry-level status an honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The applicants service record contains no such unusual circumstances were present and her service did not warrant an honorable discharge. The record does not contain any evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and it appears that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the applicants rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.
5. The applicant contends that she is now much better and would like to rejoin the Army. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Based on AR 635-5-1 and the SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table, the applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3. There are no basis upon which to grant a change to the reason or to the RE code. An RE Code of 3 indicates the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist. If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact a local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist. Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.
6. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service being both proper and equitable, recommend the board deny relief.
SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:
Type of Hearing: Records Review Date: 22 May 2013 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Board Vote:
Character Change: 0 No Change: 5
Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5
(Board member names available upon request)
Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214: No
Change Characterization to: No Change
Change Reason to: No Change
Change RE Code to: NA
Grade Restoration to: NA
Change Authority for Separation: NA
Other: NA
Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record FG - Field Grade IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NA - Not applicable SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge HS - High School NIF - Not in File SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15 HD - Honorable Discharge OAD - Ordered to Active Duty UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge
CID - Criminal investigation Department MP Military Police OMPF - Official Military Personnel File UOTH - Under Other Than Honorable
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont) AR 20130005664
Page 5 of 5 pages
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)
CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030356
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015184
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017136
Applicant Name: ????? The applicants service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080017136 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007904
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 July 2012, for a period of 3 years and 24 weeks. On 25 January 2013, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with an uncharacterized separation of service. It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018230
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40 will normally be honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000292
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 9 June 2009 for a period of 8 years, and reported to her active duty training on 28 December 2009. It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002332
It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. The Regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003408
The unit commander recommended the applicants separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge and advised the applicant of her rights. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: She received a negative counseling statement dated, 29 October 1998 for being recommended for a Chapter 11 separation. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012262
The evidence of record shows that on 24 October 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (she was diagnosed as having an adjustment disorder with depressed mood), with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records for the period of enlistment under review,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070019019
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder, with service uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry-level status.