Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018431
Original file (AR20070018431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 071214	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that what he did was wrong and he would like to have another chance to make it right with a different MOS. He just need the reentry code changed to a one or a two to get back in. He helped CID with a case and they convicted him.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 070308
Discharge Received:     Date: 070524   
Chapter: 14-12c    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)
RE:     SPD: JKK
Unit/Location: B Company, 1st Battalion, 21st Infantry, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 061212. Wrongfully used d-amphetamine on or about (060727-060802) and d-methamphetamine on or about (060727-060802), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $636.00 pay for 2 months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).  

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  850128  
Current ENL Date: 051003    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  19 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 22 Days ?????
Total Service:  1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 22 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 11B10 Infantryman   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Hawaii (060206-070524)   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR, 
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: Madison, OH 44057
Current Address:  

Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      Evidence of record shows that on 8 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense in that you wrongfully used d-amphetamine on or between (060727-060802) and d-methamphetamine on or between (060727-060802), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  On 8 March 2007, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 3 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a soldier.  The applicant, as a soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” can not be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 18 June 2008              
Location: Chicago, IL

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 0    No change 5   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
























Case report reviewed and verified by:, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 15 July 2008
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20070018431

Applicant Name:           
______________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013565

    Original file (AR20070013565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 March 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for being AWOL, for wrongful use of marijuana x 2, for wrongful use of methamphetamines x 3, for wrongful use of amphetamines x 2, and for wrongful use of cocaine, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014823

    Original file (AR20060014823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 July 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense abuse of illegal drugs (tested positive for methamphetamines and amphetamines between the period of 19 December 1996 and 2 January 1997), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012947

    Original file (AR20070012947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 17 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014120

    Original file (AR20080014120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 2 June 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015441

    Original file (AR20060015441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 04Mos, 24Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 30 November 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009674

    Original file (AR20080009674.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 06Mos, 12Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of amphetamines and methamphetamines (080111-080211) and wrongful cohabitation (070410-070802), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 07 May 2008, the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016707

    Original file (AR20060016707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 December 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015160

    Original file (AR20070015160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 09Mos, 06Days ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) MARK E. COLLINS Issue a new DD Form 214 Colonel, U.S. Army Change Characterization to: President,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016417

    Original file (AR20070016417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 June 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongful use of cocaine (020206-020219), wrongful use of amphetamines and d-methamphetamine (030101-030103) and wrongful use of marijuana X 2 (020121-020219 and 021204-030103), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | ar20090007577

    Original file (ar20090007577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 February 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for testing positive on a urinalysis for the use of d-amphetamine and d-methamphetamine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action...