Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004017
Original file (AR20080004017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/03/07	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The circumstances leading up to my discharge are very much in need of review. From March 2005 till July 2005 I was attending the Non-Commissioned officer Professional Developement Course. (I also Re-Enlisted PDA until 2009 During that time) After completed both courses I returned to my unit to find out that my new Platoon Sergeant had basically turned my entire Platoon against me. And had slandered my name with the New Battalion Leadership. I had very good reason to believe that he was going to start a Paper Trail with the intention of destroying my carreer. He ordered the NCO's Not to include me in the information flow, left me out of Platoon Meetings and told the soldiers that they didnt have to listen to me (Because I wouldnt be around long!). After a couple of weeks I realized I was being left out when I came to work in the wrong uniform and at the wrong time because no one was telling me what was going on. And when I actively tried to find out what was going on I was told "Not to worry about it because it didnt affect me!" I felt so helpless I attempted to let my Chain of Command know what I was seeing. My First Sergeant and Commander allowed this to go on for weeks before the stress finally began showing itself physically in my sleep patterns and I began having Panic attacks. So I referred Myself to Mental Health. The Mental Health Proffessional Refused to believe what I was saying. And convinced me that maybe I had a Bi-Polar Disorder and Gave me Medication (Olanzapine) which if you dont know will make someone that is NOT Bipolar Suffer even more Powerful Episodes of Anxiety and Emotional breakdowns. After the Meds made me over-sleep I was counseled, After my panic went through the roof after being on the Meds for a while. My Platoon Sergeant began trying anything he could to get me to snap. It was then recommeded that I not be trusted with my own weapon! I had not threatened anyone.  After several attempts to embarass me in front of my soldiers he actually made the statement "I own you Sgt Sharp! And im going to destroy you!" I filed an IG complaint with the Ft. Bragg, 82nd Inspector General. And nothing happened.  Ultimately I was discharged by the Mental Health Professional "For the Good of the Army!"  I did not want out of the Army I fought my discharge till the last day. And was actually Blackmailed out of my Chapter Board by the Battalion Commander when he held my Seperation Pay over my head. Saying he would have me discharged within a week if I tried to request a board!   I have actually attempted to re-enter active duty but was shown up by the Recruiter after she found out that my Veterans Affairs Disability was approved. None of my disabilities caused my discharge. 
There is alot more we need to discuss however. I can not include everything here.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 051109
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 060315   Chapter: 5-17      AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability	   RE:     SPD: JFV   Unit/Location: Headquarters & Service Battery, 1st Bn, 319th Airborne Field Artillery Regiment, Ft. Bragg, NC 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050901, fail to go at the time prescribed (050903), disrespectful language to a commissioned officer (050725), disobeyed a lawful order X2 (050726); forfeiture of $480 per month for one month, restriction and extra duty for 14 days (CG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  24
Current ENL Date: 050614    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 08Mos, 09Days ?????
Total Service:  		05 Yrs, 08Mos, 09Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA 000119-050613/HD
Highest Grade: E-5		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 13F2P 5W/Fire Support Specialist   GT: 109   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: Iraq (030814-031015) & Afghanistan (020707-030114)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAMx3, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR, ACM, ICM 

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that the applicant was diagnosed with a mood disorder not otherwise specified.  On 9 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical condition, not a disability with a honorable discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable discharge.  On 30 November 2005, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in his/her service that warrant such characterization.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review and the issue he submitted, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case.  A mental status evaluation by competent medical authority diagnosed the applicant with a mood disorder not otherwise specified .  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation under provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other physical or mental condition not amounting to a disability, with an honorable characterization of service.  The analyst was satisfied that all the requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3”  and a reason of "Physical Condition, Not a Disability" as stipulated by Army Regulation 635-5-1, no other reason is authorized based on the diagnosis.  If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  Therefore, the analyst determined the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 19 December 2008         Location: Washington, D. C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080004017
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015469

    Original file (AR20080015469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? But still i was discharged. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080015469 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016541

    Original file (AR20100016541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Finally, the applicant contends that the narrative reason for his discharge should be changed because he was suffering from a mental condition.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013804

    Original file (AR20080013804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019786

    Original file (AR20080019786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I got to the point i couldnt stop thinking about the problem even at work. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110001145

    Original file (AR20110001145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The major commander recommended separation from the Army with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records and the issues he submitted, the analyst determined that the evidence was not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of the discharge under review. The applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008084

    Original file (AR20100008084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 15 December 2008, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00665

    Original file (ND04-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00665 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040317. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After we were sent back to home port in Japan, it all started again, so after being at Sea for 4 months we wanted to celebrate.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013896

    Original file (AR20080013896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states,"I have made some bad decisions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003610

    Original file (AR20090003610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I arrived at my unit with marital problems but the unit was about to go to Iraq and all focus was the deployment. The Board noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, and the record reflects that the applicant did not receive an administrative separation board. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110004085

    Original file (AR20110004085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This caused me to feel even more anxiety and upset as now I was even farther away from my unit in Iraq. I was refused and due to my continued upset and resulting behavior was sent back to Ft Dix and discharged with a less than honorable character of discharge. I understand my behavior was less than what the military expects of its Soldiers, but I feel that my prior 18 years of service (Honorable discharge from the ARNG) and performance while in Iraq, should supersede the actions of a...