Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090021942
Original file (AR20090021942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/12/29	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, "I was discharged due to minor disciplinary infractions.  Those infraction consisted of being in a vehicle with an open container while being under age and having a body piercing.  Although these incidents are against military laws and regulations, I do not feel they were logical grounds for a military discharge.  I have excepted the consequences for my actions, but now that is has been about three years since my discharge I would like for my status to be upgraded."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 061220
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070112   Chapter: 14-12a       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Minor Infractions)	   RE:     SPD: JKN   Unit/Location: Maintenance Troop, Regimental Support Squadron, 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment, APO, AE Germany 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 061117, disobeyed a lawful command from CPT, her superior commissioned officer on or about (060901), forfeiture of $297.00 pay, extra duty and restriction for 14 days (CG)

Article 15, 060622, failed to go to her appointed place of duty on or about (060525), with intent to deceive, made an official statement to a SSG, which was false on or about (060525), broke restriction on or about (060525), forfeiture of $297.00 pay, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (061122), extra duty and restriction for 14 days, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (061122) (CG)

Article 15, violated a lawful general regulation by wrongfully consuming alcoholic beverages under the age of 21 on or about (060416), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $636.00 pay per month for two months, extra duty and restriction for 30 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  17
Current ENL Date: 050714    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 5 Mos, 29 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 5 Mos, 29 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92A10 Automated Logistical   GT: 97   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Germany (060711-070112)   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 20 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that she consumed alcohol while under age, failed to be at her appointed place of duty, made a false official statement, broke restriction, and disobeyed a lawful command, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  She was advised of her rights. 
       
       The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 20 December 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of her service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of her service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  The analyst noted the applicant's issue that she was discharged due to minor disciplinary infractions, which consisted of being in a vehicle with an open container while being under age and having a body piercing.  She feels that they were not logical grounds for a military discharge. 
       
       Having examined all the circumstances, the analyst determined that the applicant’s numerous incidents of misconduct did indeed adversely affect the quality of service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  These incidents of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant’s service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. 
       
       Furthermore, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 25, separation authority as “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12a,” block 26 as separation code “JKN,” and block 28, narrative reason for separation as “Misconduct (Minor Infractions).”  In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board that an administrative change be made to block 25, to read separation authority:  “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b,” block 26, separation code to read "JKA," and block 28, reason for separation to read “Pattern of Misconduct” as it was approved by the separation authority.  
       
       Except for the foregoing modification to the applicant's separation authority, separation code and the narrative reason for separation, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 24 September 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 10 November 2009.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  

Further, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the Board found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 25, separation authority as “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12a”, block 26 separation code as “JKN”, and block 28, narrative reason for separation as "Misconduct (Minor Infractions)."  In view of these errors, the Board voted to administratively change block 25, separation authority to “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b”, block 26, separation code to “JKA”, and block 28, narrative reason for separation to "Pattern of Misconduct" as approved by the separation authority.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: 'Pattern of Misconduct" under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, with a corresponding Separation Code of "JKA"
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change






Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090021942
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009592

    Original file (AR20120009592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "My discharge was unfair due to the fact that I was only 19 at the time of discharge and was suffering from mental health issues. The next day after talking to my SGT Major she went back on what she had said and counseled me that my relationship was inappropriate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002144

    Original file (20120002144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) as something other than "4." The "JKA" SPD code is the code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct. The evidence of record shows the applicant was approved for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002591

    Original file (AR20130002591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 11 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. On 27 June 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016223

    Original file (AR20060016223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Paragraph 12a by reason of misconduct-minor infractions with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 27 December 2007 Lieutenant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110006527

    Original file (AR20110006527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007046

    Original file (AR20100007046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for disobeying a lawful order x2 (070110 & 060720), failed to go to the appointed place of duty x7 (060608, 060717, 060718, 060719, 060720, 061121 & 061122), made a false official statement (060908), disrespectful in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006788

    Original file (AR20130006788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 25 February 2013, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12a, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for minor disciplinary infractions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided DA Form 3822, Report of Mental Status Evaluation, dated 18 December 2012; and inpatient treatment medical record, dated 15 January 2013. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009021

    Original file (AR20080009021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 149 submitted in lieu of DD Form 293 and supporting documents in which the Applicant states that her reason for separation should be changed because the evidence used should have been supressed and it was used in the decision to discharge her from the Army. The analyst determined that the applicant’s issue requesting that the evidence that should have been suppressed during her Administrative Separation Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010502

    Original file (AR20090010502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the Applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Notwithstanding the propriety of the Applicant's discharge, as evidenced by the unit commander informing the Applicant of initiating the discharge process under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, and the unit commander's subsequent recommendation to the separation authority to discharge the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2014 | AR20140003193

    Original file (AR20140003193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293, dated 13 February 2014, and a DD Form 214 covering the period of service under review. After a careful review of the applicant’s request and his military records, as to the administrative error in his DD Form 214, the service record reflects that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 25, separation authority as AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(1), block 26 separation...