Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010407
Original file (AR20120010407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2012/06/01	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, with all due respect to his former unit and commander, he feels that he was misjudged as a Soldier and did not do anything so terrible as to be discharged an other-than-
honorable.  His unit was in Iraq and he was eager to join them but he found out his commander did not want him there based on the false accusation that he was a “trouble maker."  He takes full responsibility for his actions but he feels he was “picked on” while on rear detachment.  Since his discharge, he has been an outstanding member of society and he only wishes to have access to the benefits he paid into in order to further his education. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 080318
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080402   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: B Company, 2d Brigade Combat Team (Rear)(Provisional), Fort Campbell, KY. 

Time Lost: The unit commander's memorandum of notification of intent to  separate indicates the applicant was AWOL for 31 days (070910-071010).  However, the lost time was not annotated in block 29 on the DD Form 214.  

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 071029, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time, reduction to E-2, suspended, forfeiture of $357.00 pay per month for one month, suspended, and 14 days restriction and 14 days extra duty. CG 

080111, wrongfully used marijuana (071204), reduction to E- 1, forfeiture of $815.00 pay per month for 2 months, 45 days restriction and 45 days extra duty. (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: 060110    Current ENL Term: 03 Years  22 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 02 Mos, 23 Days ?????
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 02 Mos, 23 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92F10 Petroleum Supply Specialist   GT: 100   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Korea   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 18 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense for being AWOL (070910-071010) and testing positive for marijuana use (071204), with an under than honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       The record is void of the applicant's Election of Rights memorandum; however, there is a presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs that shall be applied in any review unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption and the analyst presumes government regularity.    
       
       The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst determined that the discharge is improper.    
       
       The applicant was notified under Board Procedures, AR 635-200, and the final decision for his characterization of service was to be made by the General Court Martial Convening Authority (GCMCA).  
       
       A legal review indicates that the Rear Commander, 101st Airborne Division (Air) (Assault) (Rear) (Provisional), Fort Campbell, Kentucky, did not have the authority to approve the Chapter 14 and direct the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge because he was not delegated the authority of a General Court Martial Convening Authority.  
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the discharge was improper and recommends to the board that relief be granted in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to secretarial authority.  This action does not entail a restoration of grade.   
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 31 October 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: An online DD Form 293 and DD Form 214

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was improper.  The applicant was notified under Board Procedures, AR 635-200, the final decision for his characterization of service was to be made by the General Court Martial Convening Authority (GCMCA).  The record shows that the Rear Commander, 101st Airborne Division (Air) (Assault) (Rear) (Provisional) Fort Campbell, Kentucky, did not have such authority.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority.  This action entails a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code to 3.  




























        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 5    No change 0
Reason -     Change 5    No change 0
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under Provision of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, with a               corresponding SPD Code of JFF (Involuntary Discharge).
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




JOSEPH M. BYERS
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder














Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20120010407
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 4 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005437

    Original file (AR20090005437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006742

    Original file (AR20090006742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 20 December 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015228

    Original file (AR20070015228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct for his discreditable involvement with military authorities and his history of domestic violence dating back to (050209), for which he is currently facing 7 counts of assault in U.S. District Court with a court date of (060403), with an under other...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013619

    Original file (AR20110013619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander's reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006426

    Original file (AR20090006426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 27 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted that the applicant was discharged by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110015899

    Original file (AR20110015899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 19 May 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 14 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018789

    Original file (AR20110018789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 17 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 2 September 2011, self authored statement.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012751

    Original file (AR20100012751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 27 August 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110003970

    Original file (AR20110003970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 1 November 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because his quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120002757

    Original file (AR20120002757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 May 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)” and the separation code is "JKK."