Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021233
Original file (AR20110021233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/10/17	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he served his country and his Commanding Officer did not like him because he told it like it was.  If someone messed up, he would let them know.  He, has taken a beating for his country, and he is proud of it.  He would serve again in a heartbeat.  He loves his country and was discharged for no good reason.  He has wanted to to rejoin, but he cannot because of his discharge.  He is requesting for help so that he can serve his country again and do it right this time. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090407
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090501   Chapter: 14-12b    AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern or Misconduct 	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: D Company, 2nd BN, 6th Infantry Regiment, 2nd BDE (Rear) (Provisional), Baumholder, Germany. 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080620, failed to schedule and attend physical therapy appointments (080401-080505); extra duty for seven days, restriction for seven days (Summarized).

080908, FTR X 4 (080409), (080627), (080728), and (080809); reduction to E-3, forfeiture of $370 pay, extra duty for 14 days, and restriction for 14 days (CG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 051020    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  20 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	03 Yrs, 06 Mos, 12 Days ?????
Total Service:  		03 Yrs, 06 Mos, 12 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 19D10/Cavalry Scout   GT: 97   EDU: GED   Overseas: Germany, SWA   Combat: Iraq (060621-061114)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ICM W/CS ,ASR, OSR, CAB

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 1 April 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for operating a motor vehicle without a valid driver's license, dereliction of duty, violating a lawful order from a commissioned, officer (080401-080505), breaking restriction, failing to report to his appointed place of duty on diverse occasions (080908), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 1 April 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action,  and submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 21 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of the former Soldier’s service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The applicant states he is asking for some help so that he can serve again.  At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3.”  If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.  
       
             The applicant further states that his CO did not like him because he told it like it was.  The analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       Furthermore, the analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life and noted the diagnosis of PTSD outlined in the documents with his application.  However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
        

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 4 May 2012         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 5 October 2011, and a DD Form 214.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110021233
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018469

    Original file (AR20100018469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 29 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008483

    Original file (AR20090008483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 15 December 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008893

    Original file (AR20120008893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for the wrongful use of marijuana between 23 December 2007 and 23 January 2008, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011262

    Original file (AR20090011262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 24 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110025026

    Original file (AR20110025026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I am requesting my current discharge under honorable conditions (general) be changed to honorable condition. On 24 September 2010, the applicant consulted with legal legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not a statement in his own behalf.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018802

    Original file (AR20100018802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100006987

    Original file (AR20100006987.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 April 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving an Article 15 on 090311, having received three counseling statements regarding action that violated the UCMJ, late to PT formation and failure to be at her appointed place of duty (090323), lied to a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010175

    Original file (AR20120010175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for a positive urinalysis for marijuana (080922), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016098

    Original file (AR20080016098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006913

    Original file (AR20090006913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of serious offense for AWOL, disobey a lawful command, make a false official statement, wrongfully used peyote, stalked female Soldiers, stole government property and wrongfully wore unauthorized insignia, with an under other than honorable...