Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/11/30 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states in effect that he wants to go back in the Army but needs to have the narrative reason of this discharge changed from misconduct (serious offense) to something different. He is married, has baby on the way and wants to be a good Soldier for his family.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090623
Discharge Received: Date: 090811 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: E Co, 501st BSB, Fort Bliss, TX
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080919, disobeyed a lawful order by drinking alcohol while under the age of 21 (080517), damaged by fire military property valued at over $1,000, reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $754 for two months (suspended), 45 days of restriction and extra duty (FG)
081014, the suspended sentence of forfeiture of pay was vacated for breaking restriction (080921)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 070531 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 02Mos, 11Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 02Mos, 11Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92Y10/Unit Supply Spc GT: 111 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Huachuca City, AZ
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 17 June 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for driving while intoxicated, consuming alcohol while under the age of 21, damaging by fire military property valued at over $1,000, and for breaking restriction, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 23 June 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 24 July 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade or a change to the reason of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The applicant contends that he needs the reason for his discharge changed so that he can rejoin the Army. However, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense) and the separation code is "JKQ." Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes. The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized. There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation.
Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.
Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 3 September 2010 Location: Washington, D.C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: None
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20090020572
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090021923
On 23 October 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014113
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 July 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct- commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) for testing positive for wrongful use of marijuana (040525), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100022039
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 February 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana and driving while intoxicated, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012969
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant did not submit any issues for the board to consider. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 01 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana (060218-060417), with a general under honorable conditions discharge....
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004718
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on16 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, commission of a serious offense because he received a company grade Article 15 on (050120) for dereliction of duty and treating an NCO with contempt and testing positive for marijuana on (050114), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 March 2005, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010166
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for AWOL (040917-041002 & 041014-041101), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005775
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana, wrongful appropriation of another Soldier 's privately owned vehicle, and he committed house breaking, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 10 July 2008, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010015
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 04 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, for commission of a serious offense for using marijuana (040606-040706), with a recommendation of general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 08 February 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020618
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015305
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 January 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...