Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017572
Original file (AR20100017572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/06/30	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states "I made some mistakes while I was in the United States Army, some of which could have been dealt with in other ways being young and naive I thought to follow the crowd. I really love my county I really more than anything want back in the military I have a family now and realize that was what it was about in the beginning I tried to find ways to not want this, why it was a bad idea for me to want this.

I can't find any I spent several years trying. I hate the idea, that as of right now I can't do anything about it. I believe I should have my discharge changed because I am a better person now because of what I have, I really don't want my son growing up knowing I disgraced myself my family and my county. I believe in myself now, and I am a better person knowing what I know now and I'm ashamed of what I've done and I know in my heart I belong in the military, thanks for your time."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 061121
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 061213   Chapter: 10       AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: Company A, 187TH Ordnance Battalion, Fort Jackson, SC 

Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (060925-061107) for 44 days. The applicant surrendered to the military authorities at Fort Jackson, SC  and was transferred to Fort Knox, KY.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: IADT/060515    Current ENL Term: ?? Years  22 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	0 Yrs, 5 Mos, 16 Days The computation includes 27 days of excess leave from (061117-061213).
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 0 Mos, 4 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	 USAR 041025-041117/NA
                                        RA     041118-050325/UNC
                                        ARNG 060328-060515/NA
                                             (Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 95   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 16 November 2006, the applicant was charged with AWOL from (060925-061108).  On 16 November 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. 
       
       Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 30 November 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  
       
       The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he made some mistakes while he was in the United States Army, some of which could have been dealt with in other ways being young and naïve, he thought to follow the crowd.  The analyst found that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  The analyst further found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.  Further, the analyst concluded that the discrediting entry constituted a departure from the standards of conduct expected of Soldiers in the Army. 
       
       The applicant further contends that he wants to go back into the military.  At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 18 March 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 27 June 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100017572
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000687

    Original file (AR20090000687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012124

    Original file (AR20110012124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 25 May 2011 and a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period of service ending 31 October 2003.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011311

    Original file (AR20090011311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007087

    Original file (AR20090007087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am only trying to better myself and help my family out as well by going to college however I don't think i can make it when I try to transfer to a better university and find that I can't pay for the tuition by myself because I can't find a good job. The applicant states in his request that he and his therapist decided to take the necessary actions to be discharged from the Army Reserve before he had to report to initial active duty training. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014576

    Original file (AR20100014576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100009962

    Original file (AR20100009962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. However, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015659

    Original file (AR20100015659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020086

    Original file (AR20080020086.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for commission of a serious offense, absent without leave (040115-080416) with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008983

    Original file (AR20090008983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: Not in File Discharge Received: Date: 070403 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: A Co, 3-81 AR Bn, Fort Knox, KY Time Lost: 50 days, AWOL (060914-061102), surrendered; AWOL again for 41 days (070209-070321), surrendered. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004487

    Original file (AR20120004487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 12 August 1998, the senior intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended the applicant's discharge be referred to an administrative separation board to consider whether the applicant should be separated from the Army. On 27 August 1998, the separation authority referred the applicant's discharge to a standing separation board to determined whether the applicant should be separated from the Army.