Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015659
Original file (AR20100015659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/05/27	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states "When I joined the Army, I was 17 years old. It was my first time away from home, and I was a scared kid. When I got sick leave due to a stress fractured foot, I never reported back for duty. It was a stupid, childish mistake that I have regretted ever since. I forgot the oath I took, dishonored myself, and have not been able to hold my head high since. That was over 10 years ago now, I am no longer a kid - I've matured, graduated college, and want to serve my country. 

This is not about needing a job, I have a good one. My life would certainly be easier if I just stuck it out here. But the easy way out is what caused my problem years ago. I love my country, and want to give something back. I swore an oath to defend the country and the constitution; years ago I forgot what that was, and now that I want to fufill it, I cannot - not without your help.

I am honestly not sure what action to request. I'm a different person than I was 10 years ago. If I could talk to that scared kid, I would tell him taking the easy way out wasn't worth a decade of being ashamed. All I want is to be able to join the Army again. I want to fufill the oath I took years ago. I want to be able to live up to the Army values, which I know I posess.

Regardless of your decision, I thank you for your time. It is more than I deserve, but I can't fix my life's biggest mistake without your help, so I have to ask."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 000404
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 000918   Chapter: 10       AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: Company E, 2nd Battalion, 19TH Infantry, Fort Benning, GA. 

Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (990602-990711) for 40 days, surrendered to the military authorities at Fort Knox, KY. 

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  17
Current ENL Date: 990127    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  17 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 6 Mos, 12 Days The computation includes 426 days of excess leave from (990721-000918)
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 6 Mos, 12 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 127   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant stated in his issue that he has graduated from college (i.e., The University of Alabama in Huntsville).

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 20 July 1999, the applicant was charged with AWOL from (990602-990712).  On 20 July 1999, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 29 May 2000, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  
       
       The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that when he joined the Army, he was just a 17 years old and It was his first time away from home, and he was a scared kid.  The analyst found that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  The analyst further found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. 
       
       The applicant further contends that all he wants is to be able to join the Army again and fufill the oath he took years ago.  At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 11 February 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 19 May 2010, and a copy of his Bachelor of Arts Degree from the University of Alabama in Huntsville dated in the month of May 2009.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 1    No change 4
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100015659
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 2 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001423

    Original file (AR20080001423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018572

    Original file (AR20100018572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states "My name is , I join the Army in December of 2008 and was discharge in march of 2009 during the time I was in basic training I got news from my wife that the state is trying to take the kids away from me and my ex wife. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct” and the separation code is "JGA" with a reentry eligibility...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004934

    Original file (AR20090004934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I want to serve my country but am not able to due to my confusion as a child and my niativety during Basic Training to do exactly what I was told, no questions asked. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00500

    Original file (ND00-00500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00500 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000314, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I just wanted to be able to pursue my dream of becoming a police officer and to help society in helping keep law and order and peace in our country. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010299

    Original file (AR20090010299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018954

    Original file (AR20100018954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 November 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for dishonorably failing to pay a debt to World Finance Corporation, for being AWOL for three days, and for lying to a non-commissioned officer, with a honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009592

    Original file (AR20120009592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "My discharge was unfair due to the fact that I was only 19 at the time of discharge and was suffering from mental health issues. The next day after talking to my SGT Major she went back on what she had said and counseled me that my relationship was inappropriate.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010483

    Original file (AR20090010483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that "I am requesting a change to my discharge because I would like to be reconsidered for service in the Army. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01091

    Original file (ND04-01091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-01091 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040622. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Besides my discharge which not everybody knows about I am very well liked.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015503

    Original file (AR20100015503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good...