Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/05/11	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states "I would like the opportunity to "right my wrong", I've been judged everywhere I've applied due to this type of discharge. I can't get back into the military because they are not giving waivers for this type of discharge. I know it doesn't seem right, why would someone get out of the military and then want to come back in, but one of the reasons is that i just don't want my discharge upgraded and thats it, i want to complete what i left in bad status into good status and prove that i'm not a misconducted soldier/person. As it stands, my discharge doesn't say who i am as a person. 

I believe i was punished justly in 2004 at the time of my discharge, but not for it to follow me to the present and continue to follow me into the future. I would really like my discharge upgraded to honorable because i really did serve my country with honor and would really like to continue to do so. I am not a disrespectful person. I don't want to be judged wrongly, solely by what a document (DD 214) ,or any other document for that matter, says especially one with such authority. I would like to continue to serve my country at this time, but it seems impossible with this type of discharge."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 041028
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 041221   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: 58th Quartermaster Company, 240th Quartermaster Battalion, 49th Quartermaster Group, Fort Lee, VA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040730, failed to obey a lawful order issued by a CW2 on or about (040618), disrespectful in deportment toward a SSG, a noncommissioned officer on or about (040618), left his appointed place of duty on or about (040330), failed to obey a lawful order issued by a 1SG, on or about (040402), failed to go to his appointed place of duty on or about (040402), reduction to the grade of Private (E-1), forfeiture of $596.00 pay per month for two months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050128), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  23
Current ENL Date: Reenl/030702    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 5 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Total Service:  		3 Yrs, 8 Mos, 5 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA 010417-030701/HD
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 63B10 Light Wheel Vehicle Mech   GT: 104   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Germany (011011-031004)   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, GCMDL, NDSM, GWTSM, C/Ach (3), C/Aprec

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he failed to obey orders, disrespected a warrant officer, missed numerous formations, and therefore he was no longer compatible for military service, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. 
       
       The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he wants to complete what he left in bad status into a good status and prove that he is not a misguided person and continue to serve his country.  The analyst considered the applicant’s quality of service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review.  However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge. 
       
       Further, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3.”  If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contine to contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.   
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 28 January 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 4 May 2010, copies of his Certificates of Awards and Appreciation, and a Character reference Letter. 

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100014576
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages