Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/05/27 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states "While I was in the 82nd ABN DIV I got married and my wife was using drugs while I was out in the field. That prevented me from paying my bills. I have since separated from her and I am currently in the process of finalizing my divorce to her. I have had no contact with her since I left her.
I currently work at Auto Zone and have been there coming up on 3 years now. I have not been in any trouble with the law, and I have been able to pay my bills on time when they are due."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050208
Discharge Received: Date: 050322 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: Alpha Company, 1st Battalion, 325th Airborne Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 041115, failed to go to his appointed place of duty of duty on or or about (040923), the continuation sheet (DA Form 2627) is not in the available record; reduction to the grade of Private (E-1), forfeiture of $597.00 pay per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050514), restriction and extra dity for 45 days (FG)
Article 15, 040729, failed to go to his appointed place of duty on or about (040716), the continuation sheet (DA Form 2627) is not in the available record; reduction to the grade of Private First Class (E-3), foreiture of $349.00 pay per month for 1 month, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050125), restriction and extra duty for 45 days (CG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 020605 Current ENL Term: 6 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 9 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 9 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11B1P Infantryman GT: 99 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant stated in his issue that he is currently working at Auto Zone and has been there for 3 years. He has not been in any trouble with the law, and he has been able to pay his bills on time when they are due.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 8 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct for his continuous disciplinary problems, to include two Article 15s he received within a five month period, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant voluntarily waived his right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 February 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The record contains a Military Police Report in reference to the aplicant's offense of; child abuse dated 10 November 2000.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he got married and his wife was using drugs while he was out in the field and that prevented him from paying his bills. He has since separated from her and is currently in the process of finalizing his divorce. While the applicant may believe his family issues at home was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record of evidence does not demonstrate that he sought relief from his issues through his command or the numerous Army community services like the Chaplain, Army Community and Family Support Services, Community Counseling Center, and other medical resources available to all Soldiers. Likewise, he has provided no evidence that he should not be held responsible for his misconduct.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 9 February 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 19 May 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100015663
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009349
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 April 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for abuse of illegal drugs on two occasions and failure to report, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 May 2000, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016540
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 August 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Misconduct, Commission of Serious Offense Other: Change SPD code to JKQ RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090021873
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014001
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor pattern of misconduct: on two known occassions you altered official documetns and falsified information on an official records with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009282
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 7, paragraph 7-17, AR 635-200, by reason of fraudulent entry, for completing his enlistment and subsequent re-enlistment contracts with false information in that he indicated that he had never been charged with any criminal misconduct, when he was in fact charged with numerous acts of criminal misconduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028191
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 January 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014010
While in Afghanistan, I was awarded an Army Commendation Medal for Exceptionally meritorious service while serving with Task Force Devil during Operation Enduring Freedom. This was awarded to me by COL John F. Campbell HQs 1st BDE, 82D ABN DIV. This recommendation was made after full consideration of his faithful and honorable service, as well as his record of misconduct. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023407
Applicant Name: ????? I made some bad choices and still pay to this day and regret it all. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Chnage RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010955
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 March 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense; in that he used marijuana; drove under the influence of alcohol and violated the terms of his restriction, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 March 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000507
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 August 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense; in that he was disrespectful to his superior commissioned officer and was found guilty of the offense by a Summary Court-Martial, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 12 September 2000,...