Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/06/01 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, "I feel as though my discharge should be up graded, because when the offense of THC came up in my urine, ( I went to a celabration because i was Ets ing and let my guard down. and for that im sorry) i was a young teenager. that still gave close to my full time in service, i was short one month when i received my chapter 13 , all of my dues were paid in to the program. I now need help with paying for school. to advance myself please take upgrading my discharge into consideration . Ounce again i was one month from ETS ing and i currently have not came in contact with thc in the last 8 years . I would like to use my gi bill to pay for schooling and futher educate myself and my community."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 000419
Discharge Received: Date: 000607 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: HHB, 3rd Bn, 321 FA, Fort Bragg, NC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 981118, In that you did, at or near Ft. Bragg, NC between on or about 20 Sep 98 to 19 Oct 98, wrongfully use marijuana; reduction to the grade of E2; forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for two months; to perform extra duty for 45 days. (FG)
000216, In that you did, at or near Ft. Bragg, NC, on or between 21 Dec 99 to 20 Jan 00, wrongfully use marijuana; reduction to the grade of E1, forfeiture of $502 pay per month for two months; restriction to the limits of the barracks, dining facility, place of worship, place of duty, medical and dental facilities, and the 82nd Airborne Shoppette on Ft. Bragg for 45 days; to perform extra duty for 45 days. (FG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 17
Current ENL Date: 970724 Current ENL Term: 3 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 10Mos, 14Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 10Mos, 14Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 63B10/Light Wheeled Veh Mech GT: 99 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 19 April 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for abuse of illegal drugs on two occasions and failure to report, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 10 May 2000, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 11 May 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities. Furthermore, the analyst noted that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age. There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 7 May 2010 Location: Washington, D.C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: None
Exhibits Submitted: None
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20090009349
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004041
Applicant Name: ????? By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and the misconduct diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011250
Applicant Name: ????? I believe that even though my conduct in the army was not becoming during my time in service several times, I have learned from my mistakes to become a better person and should not be looked upon badly by the U.S Army that I proudly served and wish to serve in once again. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100022442
Applicant Name: ????? None of the soldiers, myself included, ever received any form of drug abuse counseling or rehabilitation. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 March 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana (081201-081215) and wrongfully using hashish while in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008359
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 October 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012679
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 March 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12B, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconductfor illegal drug use, disobeying lawful orders, and failing to be at appointed place of duty on numerous occasions, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 19 April 2004, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012338
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080207 Discharge Received: Date: 080303 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct, (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: 600th QM, 7th Trans Bn, Fort Bragg, NC Time Lost: AWOL x 2 for a total of 100 days; 20 days (070718-070806), mode of return unknown; 80 days (071106-080124), mode of return unknown. On 12 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090017551
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: Yes Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted a document with two issues (3 pages) his Enlisted Record Brief, and his DD Form 214. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007868
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12C(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor abuse of illegal drugs receiving two Article 15s for wrongful use of marijuana and for being AWOL, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 May 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004610
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015152
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The applicant, as a NCO, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 14 December 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...