Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/02/25 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states in effect that she desires to serve her country again by reenlisting in the US Army.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 070909 Chapter: NIF AR: 135-178
Reason: NIF RE: SPD: NIF Unit/Location: 475th Eng Co, Horizontal Cons, Ponce, PR
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 040816 Current ENL Term: 08 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 11Mos, 20Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 11Mos, 20Days ?????
Previous Discharges: ADT-040920-050321/UNC
Highest Grade: E3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92A10/Automated Logistical Specialist GT: NIF EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Kissimmee, FL
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the United States Army Reserve. However, on 18 September 2007, DA, HQ, 65th US Army Regional Readiness Command, Fort Buchanan, PR, Orders 07-261-00007, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 9 September 2007, with a general under honorable conditions discharge.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve. The service of a member separated under this provision of Army Regulation 135-178 will be characterized as honorable or under honorable conditions as warranted by his or her military record. The service of a member who is separated while in an entry level status will be described as uncharacterized.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues she submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the United States Army Reserve. However, on 18 September 2007, DA, HQ, 65th US Army Regional Readiness Command, Fort Buchanan, PR, Orders 07-261-00007, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 9 September 2007, with a general under honorable conditions discharge.
This document identifies the characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
The applicant's contentions were carefully considered. However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown. The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 19 November 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, Self-authored letter, Letter, dated 2 February 2010, Discharge order, dated 18 September 2007, Order, dated 16 August 2004, Individual Training Record (2 pages), Certification of Birth, Copy of ID Card, Course Completion Certificate, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100009450
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015608
This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Further, regarding the applicant's issue in reference to him reenlisting in the Army, the analyst found that at the time of discharge the applicant was issued an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110014905
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that he was unjustly discharged and reduced in rank because he had requested to be released from his contract due to his 50 percent PTSD disability rating which was service connected as determined by the Veterans Administration. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000371
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 12, Paragraph 12-1d, AR 135-178, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs for testing positive for marijuana (070210), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011017
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 12, Paragraph 12-1d, AR 135-178, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs for testing positive for marijuana (070210), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Further, in regards to the applicant's issue in that he did not receive legal counseling, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009146
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012000
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Unsigned statement, DD Form 214 for the period ending (030401) and discharge order from the United States Army Reserve dated (071217).
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001531
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents she submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The Board may only change the characterization or reason for discharge. Further, the analyst determined that the applicants Official Military Personnel File...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004922
The record indicates that on 10 December 2005, DA HQS, U. S. Army Reserve Command, Ft McPherson, GA, discharged the applicant from the Army Reserve, with Order 05-344-00016, effective 31 December 2005, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army Reserve. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007087
I am only trying to better myself and help my family out as well by going to college however I don't think i can make it when I try to transfer to a better university and find that I can't pay for the tuition by myself because I can't find a good job. The applicant states in his request that he and his therapist decided to take the necessary actions to be discharged from the Army Reserve before he had to report to initial active duty training. Board Action Directed President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008001
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 March 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant by certified mail of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation for accumulating 31 unexcused absences between 12 March 1999 and 6 February 2000, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 7 January 2001, the separation authority waived further...