Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/07/08 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states "Because my unit showed no support for me. Certain NCO's had their own agenda's of getting me out of the military. I felt that I was getting slammed for my actions and not helped in the correct way." Additionally, the applicant would like to again serve with the US Military."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 071217 Chapter: NIF AR: 135-178
Reason: NIF RE: SPD: NIF Unit/Location: 6015 USAR Garr Spt Unit (-), Forest Park, IL
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 25
Current ENL Date: 051102 Current ENL Term: NIF Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 01Mos, 16Days ?????
Total Service: 08 Yrs, 01Mos, 20Days ?????
Previous Discharges: RA-991028-030401/HD
USARCG-030402-051101/NA
Highest Grade: E4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92G10/Food Service Specialist GT: 95 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Germany (Prior Period of Service) Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR, OSR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the United States Army Reserve. However, on 17 December 2007, DA, HQ, 88th Regional Readiness Command, Fort Snelling, MN, Orders 07-351-00052, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 17 December 2007, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and Army National Guard.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues she submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the United States Army Reserve. However, on 17 December 2007, DA, HQ, 88th Regional Readiness Command, Fort Snelling, MN, Orders 07-351-00052, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 17 December 2007, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. This document identifies the characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
The analyst noted the applicant's contentions that her unit showed no support for her. However, the analyst is unable to determine whether her contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown. The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 19 May 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: Unsigned statement, DD Form 214 for the period ending (030401) and discharge order from the United States Army Reserve dated (071217).
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20090012000
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022998
Applicant Name: ????? The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015266
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 060427 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve RE: SPD: NIF Unit/Location: HHC, 367th Engineer Bn, St. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011568
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 10 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014132
The analyst noted that on 12 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 135-178, Chapter 9, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009885
Applicant Name: ????? The record shows an NGB 22 for service between 070529-080430 with an honorable characterization of service. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011717
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve when it is determined that a service member is unqualified for further military service by reason of unsatisfactory participation. An enlisted member separated for misconduct which includes unsatisfactory participation will normally be furnished a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions in accordance with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007913
Applicant Name: ????? Soldiers completing Phase I (BCT) remain in entry-level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011904
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014636
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 050319 Chapter: NIF AR: 135-178 Reason: NIF RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 812th Trans Co, Travers City, MI Time Lost: NIF Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Also, regarding the applicant's issue in reference to him reenlisting in the United States Army Reserve, the analyst found that at the time of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000678
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.