Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/07/11 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that he was unjustly discharged and reduced in rank because he had requested to be released from his contract due to his 50 percent PTSD disability rating which was service connected as determined by the Veterans Administration. He notified his unit about his worsening condition but his company commander reduced him from E-5 to E-4 and he was very disappointed. He requested a medical evaluation board which was denied and was later processed for separation and he received an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He requests an upgrade to honorable, his rank back, and that his bonus which he had to repay be forgiven.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 100427 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178
Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 389th EN Co, Middletown, IA
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 32
Current ENL Date: 071007 Current ENL Term: 6 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 06Mos, 20Days ?????
Total Service: 17 Yrs, 08Mos, 21Days Includes inactive service
Previous Discharges: USAR 920806-010726/NIF
IADT 930701-931029/UNC
OAD 030315-040530/HD
USAR 010727-040909/HD
USAR 040910-071006/HD
Highest Grade: E-5 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 21W20/Carpentry and Masonry Spc GT: 113 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: SWA Combat: Iraq (030609-040501)
Decorations/Awards: AAM, ARCAM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, AFRM-M, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Burlington, IA
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows the applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army Reserve.
The record indicates that on 27 April 2010, DA HQS, 416th Theater Engineer Command, Darien, IL, Orders number 10-117-00007, discharged the applicant from the Army Reserve, effective 27 April 2010, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions AR 135-178, for Unsatisfactory Participation.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 135-178 governs procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army Reserve. Chapter 13 of the regulation provides in pertinent part that individuals can be separated for being an unsatisfactory participant. Army Regulation 135-91 states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1 year period and attempts to have the Soldier respond or comply with orders or correspondence have resulted in the Soldiers refusal to comply with orders or correspondence; or a notice sent by certified mail was refused, unclaimed, or otherwise undeliverable; or verification that the Soldier has failed to notify the command of a change of address and reasonable attempts to contact the Soldier have failed. Discharge action may be taken when the Soldier cannot be located or is absent in the hands of civil authorities in accordance with the provisions of AR 135-91, paragraph 2-18, and Chapter 3, section IV, of AR 135178. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue and medical documents (PTSD) submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
On 27 April 2010, DA HQS, 416th Theater Engineer Command, Darien, IL, Orders number 10-117-00007, discharged the applicant from the Army Reserve, effective 27 April 2010, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicants discharge are not contained in the available records and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
The applicant contends that he was being treated for PTSD and requested to be released from his contract. However, the facts pertaining to the applicants discharge are not contained in his record and the analyst presumed government regularity.
The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents (entire discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue about getting his rank back and the remission of his bonus which he must pay back; however, the corrections the applicant requests do not fall within the purview of this Board. The applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), utilizing the enclosed DD Form 149 regarding this matter. A DD Form 149 may also be obtained from a Veterans' Service Organization.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 17 August 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: VA decision for award of PTSD, Mental Health memorandum (3), mental health evaluation, doctor's statement, DD Form 293 and a self-authored statement.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110014905
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016312
The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13-1, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant contends that he was suffering from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which caused him not to be able to function properly as a Soldier. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011290
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. However, on 6 January 2009, Headquarters, 416th Theater Engineer Command, 108100 S. Frontage Rd, Darien, IL, Orders 09-006-00022, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 30 January 2009, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015632
Applicant Name: ????? This recommendation was made after full consideration of his faithful and honorable service, as well as the former Soldiers record of available evidence related to his unsatisfactory participation in the US Army Reserve. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012212
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions. However, at the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions discharge which constitutes a non-waiverable disqualification, thus the applicant is no longer eligible to reenlist.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100009450
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015608
This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Further, regarding the applicant's issue in reference to him reenlisting in the Army, the analyst found that at the time of discharge the applicant was issued an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011017
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 12, Paragraph 12-1d, AR 135-178, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs for testing positive for marijuana (070210), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Further, in regards to the applicant's issue in that he did not receive legal counseling, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011383
The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. After his service in Iraq he could not stand being around people in uniform so he stopped going to scheduled drills. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012261
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-138, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a general, under conditions discharge. The separation approving authority's documentation directing that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions is not contained in the available...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016326
On 13 July 2006, the unit commander declared the applicant an unsatisfactory participant and recommended that he be processed for separation (discharged) from the US Army Reserve under the provisions of AR 135-178. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...