Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020592
Original file (AR20090020592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/11/24	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 149 submitted by the applicant in lieu of DD Form 293.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 050606
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 050709   Chapter: 14-12c    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: HHC, 1/1 Aviation Reg, APO, AE 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050525, possess approximately 23 grams of marijuana at or near Katterback Kaserne, wrongfully used marijuana (050406) and wrongfully introduced approximately 23 grams of marijuana onto a vessel, aircraft, vehicle or installation used by the armed forces to wit: Katterbach, Kaserne (050406-050507); reduction to E1, forfeiture of $667 pay for two months, 45 days extra duty and restriction (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 010706    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  46 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	4 Yrs, 00Mos, 04Days ?????
Total Service:  		4 Yrs, 00Mos, 04Days Extended for the Convenience of the Government
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 89B10 Ammunition Spec   GT: 90   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Germany, SWA   Combat: Iraq (021015-030523 & 040401-050207)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTEM, AREM, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Frederiksted, V.I.
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 6 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongfully used, possessed and introduced onto Katterbach Kaserne, marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       He was advised of his rights.  On 7 June 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf; however, the statement is not part of the available record.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       On  22 June 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
       The record contains a CID Report dated 13 May 2005 citing the applicant as the Subject for wrongful introduction, possession and use of marijuana.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  
       The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       Furthermore, the record does not support the issue that the applicant suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.  Further, the applicant states that he has been diagnosed with PTSD and that he has a VA claim number.  The applicant should send these documents to the Board for consideration.
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 7 April 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA














VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090020592
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013033

    Original file (AR20080013033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 18 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016830

    Original file (AR20070016830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 28 June 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 9 July 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006169C071116

    Original file (AR20070006169C071116.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board per his offer to plead guilty (pretrial agreement), dated 9 January 2004, and did not submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 6 February 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006169C071116

    Original file (AR20070006169C071116.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board per his offer to plead guilty (pretrial agreement), dated 9 January 2004, and did not submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 6 February 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013230

    Original file (AR20090013230.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 070710 Discharge Received: Date: 070801 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: 1AB, Co A, ENL TR 1/13 AV TC, Ft. Rucker, AL Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. On 20 July 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015272

    Original file (AR20080015272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006353

    Original file (AR20060006353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 17 April 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (abuse of a illegal drug "marijuana" which he possessed, used, and introduced to the SHAPE Community, his attempt to commit assault and for committing adultery), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006169aC071121

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 January 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (wrongful use of marijuana, wrongful possession of marijuana, and wrongfully introduced illegal drugs onto a military installation), with an under other then honorable conditions discharge. On 6 February 2004, the separation authority...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005098

    Original file (AR20080005098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested personal apperarance before an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 25 October 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001596

    Original file (AR20080001596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...