Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005098
Original file (AR20080005098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/04/02	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 051018
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 051107   Chapter: 14       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct, Abuse of Illegal Drugs	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HHC/Co A, 101st FSB, Fort Riley, KS 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050826, wrongfully used marijuana between (050504-050602), forfeiture of $617 x 2, extra duty for 45 days (FG).

050331, wrongfully used marijuana between (050111-050210), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $308 x 2, extra duty for 45 days (FG).

050202, wrongfully used marijuana between (030728-030827), and  wrongfully used codeine between (030824-030827), reduction to E-3, forfeiture of $368 x 2, extra duty for 45 days (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: 021107    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  with a medical waiver, which was approved on (020911)
Current ENL Service: 	03 Yrs, 00Mos, 01Days ?????
Total Service:  		03 Yrs, 00Mos, 01Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92F10 Petroleum Supply Spec   GT: 98   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (030907-040929)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, ICM, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Kissimmee, FL
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed






VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       Evidence of record shows that on 17 October 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious for wrongful use of marijuana on three separate occasions and wrongfully used codeine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested personal apperarance before an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 25 October 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. \
       
       The applicant's record contains an approved Bar to Reenlistment dated 13 September 2005.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue submitted with his application.  However, the issue does not provide the Board a basis upon which to grant relief.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 10 February 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 


        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080005098
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007770

    Original file (AR20080007770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states, "I SERVED THREE YEARS HONORABLY WITHOUT BEING IN ANY TROUBLE. On 5 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of other than honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015225

    Original file (AR20070015225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 31 January 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008644

    Original file (AR20080008644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 24 July 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002218

    Original file (AR20080002218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana on two separate occasions; willfully and without authority damaged military property of the United States; assault consummated by battery, failed to report for duty on several occasions; disrespectful in language...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001846

    Original file (AR20090001846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by an isolated incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002099

    Original file (AR20080002099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 30 December 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | Ar20080002100

    Original file (Ar20080002100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 02 February, 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (961209), minor in consumption, driving without a driver's license (961209), AWOL (970716-970718), lost military identification card, arrested for disorderly conduct, with a general under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005834

    Original file (AR20080005834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009787

    Original file (AR20090009787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for the wrongful use of marijuana, a controlled substance between (050221 and 050320 and 051211 and 060110), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009456

    Original file (AR20070009456.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 October 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for commission of a serious offense (wrongfully used marijuana between (961212-960716) and damaged another soldier's private property while engaged in a physical altercation, used provoking words and assaulted two unknown males, and were drunk...