Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2008/08/08 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See enclosed DD Form 149 submitted by the applicant in lieu of DD Form 293.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080625
Discharge Received: Date: 080725 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: E Btry, 2-43 ADA, Fort Bliss, TX
Time Lost: AWOL x 2 for 16 days (080111-080123) and (080516-080518), mode of return unknown; confinement military authorities for 25 days (080604-080629). Total time lost 41 days. Further, the applicant was ordered into pretrial confiment for 16 days (080519).
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080604, SCM, wrongful use of cocaine between (071231-080104), wrongful use of marijuana x 3 between (071204-080104), (080301-080323) and (080516-080518), wrongful possession of marijuana (080423), wrongfully introduce one ounce of marijuana (080423), AWOL x 2 from (080111-080124) and (080516-080519), missed movement (080113), conspiracy to commit an offense (080515), wrongful appropriation of a motor vehicle (080516), forfeiture of $898 x 1, reduced to E-1, and confinement for 30 days.
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 21
Current ENL Date: 070131 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 04Mos, 13Days ?????
Total Service: 01 Yrs, 04Mos, 13Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 14T10 Patriot Operator/Maintainer GT: 114 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Hamlin, NY
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 23 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for missing movement, absent without leave (AWOL), wrongful use of marijuana on divers occasions, wrongful possession of 1.2 grams of marijuana, wrongfully introduced about one ounce of marijuana, wrongful use of cocaine, wrongful appropriation of a motor vehicle, wrongfully conspired with a PVT to appropriate a vehicle and any other misconduct; further the applicant received a Summary Court Martial for missing movement, absent without leave (AWOL) x 2, wrongful use of marijuana on divers occasions, wrongful possession of marijuana x 2, wrongfully introduced marijuana onto an installation used by armed forces, wrongful use of cocaine, wrongful appropriation of a motor vehicle, and wrongfully conspired with a PVT to appropriate a vehicle, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The senior intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 18 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue indicating that he was never admitted into or enrolled in the Army Substance Abuse Program; however, AR 635-200, paragraph 1-16d(2), entitled counseling and rehabilitative requirements states that the rehabilitative requirements may be waived by the separation authority in circumstances where common sense and sound judgment indicate that such transfer will serve no useful purpose or produce a quality Soldier. Further, AR 600-85, paragraph 3-8 entitled self referrals, states that the applicant could have self referred himself to the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) counseling center for assistance. Additionally, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the characterization of service, reason for discharge and the reentry eligibility (RE) code were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 13 May 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080013033
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012950
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted a Statement of Issues, and a DD Form 214, dated (081020).
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008780
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015272
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006106
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 September 2008, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007043
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense for use and possession of illegal drugs in that he tested positive for cocaine at a unit urinalysis (080104) and received an Article 15 for cocaine (080131), with an entry level separation, uncharacterized discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007192
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020248
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 30 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020592
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongfully used, possessed and introduced onto Katterbach Kaserne, marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009653
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waiving further rehabilitative efforts and directing that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions, documentation is not part of the available record, and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014647
On 23 September 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 3 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.