Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003831
Original file (AR20080003831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/03/10	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: I was given an Uncharacterized Administrative Discharge for a "Condition, not a disability".  I understand that this type of discharge is not honorable nor dishonorable but has raised several issues for me in the process of getting hired in the public safety field, as I am pursueing a career as a firefighter.  I request that the discharge be upgraded because before attempting suicide, which is the cause for my discharge, I tried repeatedly to speak with my Drill Sgt's and tried to follow the Chain of Command to get some help in resolving the matter in a professional and honorable manner.  I believe that had I been able to speak to a medical professional about my problems I would have been able to resolve my internal conflicts and stay in basic training.  Also I had no issues with my training staff or other soldiers in training while I was there.  I performed as I was asked when I was asked and feel that there is no reason to deny me an honorable discharge.  My Drill Sgt. told me to try this because he felt that there was no grounds to deny me an honorable discharge.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 070821
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070829   Chapter: 5-17       AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability	   RE:     SPD: JFV   Unit/Location: B Co, 1/13th Inf Regt, 193d Inf Bde, Fort Jackson, SC 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  24
Current ENL Date: 070711    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  With a moral waiver, which was approved on (070612).
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 01Mos, 19Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 01Mos, 19Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 124   EDU: 14 Years   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  San Clemente, CA
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       Evidence of record shows that on 9 August 2007, the applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with a adjustment disorder with depressed mood.  On 21 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, for having been diagnosed with an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood which prevents the applicant from completing Basic Combat Training, and recommended that she be discharge with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service.  She was advised of her rights.  The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge.  On 23 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in his/her service that warrant such characterization.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue she submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood which prevented the applicant from completing Basic Combat Training.  The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status.  A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  An honorable discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issues, however, this is not an adverse separation action and denotes only that the individual had less than l80 days on active duty.  Further, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends that the Board deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 7 January 2008         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
Further, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080003831
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014720

    Original file (AR20080014720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 September 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level status performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life and for being unmotivated and unwilling to adjust to authority and the rigors of basic training, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019413

    Original file (AR20080019413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 October 1996, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). Board Action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019079

    Original file (AR20100019079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: ?????

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015184

    Original file (AR20090015184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005134

    Original file (AR20080005134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016775

    Original file (AR20060016775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFW (i.e., failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level status. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant's record and his service did not warrant an...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021713

    Original file (AR20100021713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to obey the rules and regulations set forth by the unit and the Army and for failing to meet the minimum standard prescribed for successful completion of training because...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014818

    Original file (AR20060014818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as physical condition, not a disability, with the characterization of service as uncharacterized. An RE Code of 3 indicates that the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002555

    Original file (AR20080002555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012838

    Original file (AR20090012838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 January 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the...