Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014818
Original file (AR20060014818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 061019	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 030819   
Chapter: 5-17    AR: 635-200
Reason: Physical Condition, Not A Disability
RE:     SPD: JFV
Unit/Location: C Battery, 1st Battalion, 79th Field Artillery, USAFATC, Fort Sill, OK 73503-6203 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  780704  
Current ENL Date: 030702    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01Mos, 18Days ?????
Total Service:  00 Yrs, 01Mos, 18Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 103   EDU: MS   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: See attached documents.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      Evidence of record shows that on 5 August 2003, the applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with a disorder of Axis I:  Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, and recommended that he be administratively separated from the Army in accordance with Paragraph 5-17 (Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions), AR 635-200.  The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, with an uncharacterized separation of service.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf which was not found in the available record.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge.  On 14 August 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. 

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in his service that warrant such characterization.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, documents, and the issue he submitted, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case.  The analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation of service while in an entry level status (ELS).  The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as physical condition, not a disability, with the characterization of service as uncharacterized.  A Soldier is in ELS for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable characterization of service.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.  Furthermore, individuals are assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  The applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3.  The analyst found no bases upon which to recommend a change to the applicant’s reason for discharge.  An RE Code of 3 indicates that the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.  Additionally, if the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 15 November 2007              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 0    No change 5   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.

Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 

CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 26 November 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060014818

Applicant Name:  Mr.       
______________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012761

    Original file (AR20060012761.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01Mos, 18Days ????? The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as physical condition, not a disability, with the characterization of service as uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-40, Chapter 5-5b, provides, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006016

    Original file (AR20060006016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification Signature and Date Approval...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011277

    Original file (AR20080011277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 November 1995, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with asthma and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. Board Action Directed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006269

    Original file (AR20090006269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of involuntary separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of condition, not a disability with an uncharacterized discharge. On 10 Dec 2008, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009843

    Original file (AR20080009843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 May 2008, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, she was diagnosed with an anxiety disorder not other wise specified (NOS), and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012693

    Original file (AR20090012693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2)(e), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana on three occasions between (010128-010228, 010924-011024 and 011111-011211), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 16 August 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel again...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017136

    Original file (AR20080017136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080017136 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008230

    Original file (AR20080008230.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012498

    Original file (AR20090012498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The analyst noted the applicant's issues reference his separation code hindering his efforts to seek employment and that he was told his current separation was no longer used. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Condition, Not a Disability”, and the separation code is "JFV." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006463

    Original file (AR20090006463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 5 October 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.