Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013370
Original file (AR20070013370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name: ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2007/09/27	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None	

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the Applicant

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 070521 
Discharge Received:     Date: 070525   
Chapter:  11     AR: 635-200
Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct
RE:     SPD: JGA
Unit/Location: B Co, 1-222d Aviation Rgt, 8th Transportation Bde, FT Eustis, VA 

Time Lost: None	

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070419, wrongfully having sexual intercourse (070314), made a false official statement (070314), failed to obey a lawful regulation and having an inappropriate relationship (070314), reduction to E1, forfeiture of $695.00 x 2mos, 45 days extra duty, and 45 days restriction. (FG). 

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None	

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Year/Month:  1978/03  
HOR City, State: Cantonment, FL
Current ENL Date: 060801    Current ENL Term:   6   Years  ?????
Current ENL Service:   00     Yrs,   09 Mos,   25Days ?????
Total Service:    00     Yrs,   09 Mos,   25Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade:   E2 
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None	   GT: 120   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None	   Combat: None	
Decorations/Awards: NDSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 15 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for testing positive for being pregnant (070309) while in initial-entry training (IET) status.  She was advised of her rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with an uncharacterized discharge.  On 21 May 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11, of this regulation, in pertinent part, states that a member may be separated for unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of the regulation applies to soldiers who can not meet the minimum standards for training, have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention because they can not adapt socially or emotionally to military life or because they lack the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or they have demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued military service.  The regulation requires uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue she submitted, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant did test positive for pregnancy and received an uncharacterized separation while in initial-entry training (IET) status under provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200.  The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The applicant’s current enlistment date was 1 August 2006 and the separation action was initiated on 15 May 2007.  The applicant had served a total of 221 days and therefore was no longer in ELS.  Separation under provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200 is for Entry Level Performance and Conduct while a soldier is in ELS.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the characterization is improper and recommends to the board that relief be granted in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable, and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Pregnancy under provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200 with a corresponding Separation Code of KDF (ie. Pregnancy or Childbirth).  The re-enlistment code (RE Code) for this type of separation is RE-3, therefore the applicant’s RE code is appropriate.   

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 20 August 2008              
Location: Washington D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA	

Witnesses/Observers: NA	 

Exhibits Submitted: NA	




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change   5       No change  0     - Character
		 			      Change   5       No change  0     - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
 After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the applicant’s characterization is improper.  The evidence of record supports that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, entry level performance and conduct, for being pregnant while in initial-entry level training status (IET).  The board noted that the applicant was no longer in entry level status at the time the discharge proceedings were initiated, she had completed more than 180 days of continuous active service.  AR 635-200 defines entry level status for Regular Army soldiers as the first 180-days of continuous active duty.  In view of the aforementioned, the Board voted to grant relief by changing the characterization of service to fully honorable and the narrative reason for separation to “Pregnancy” with a separation code of “KDF.”    



    

								        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: Pregnancy
Other: Change Separation Authority to AR 635-200, Chapter 8, and change separation code to KDF.
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 21 August 2008
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20070013370
______________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008525

    Original file (AR20060008525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 3 Mos, 19 Days ????? The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 31 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009440

    Original file (AR20070009440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 March 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life due to an adjustment disorder, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 27 March 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022559

    Original file (AR20120022559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 November 2007, she submitted her request for voluntary separation under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. On 19 November 2007, the separation authority approved the separation action with an honorable discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations in effect at the time for a discharge under this Chapter is "Pregnancy” and the separation code is "KDF."

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003784

    Original file (AR20080003784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and indicated that this was a standard pregnancy separation with no extenuating circumstances or pertinent issues. Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 8, paragraph 8-3b, states that prior to characterization of service as under honorable conditions, the Soldier will be advised of the specific factors in the service record that...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016542

    Original file (AR20060016542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable recommends to the Board to deny relief. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013993

    Original file (AR20070013993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011576

    Original file (AR20080011576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted with the application, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070003642aC071031

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 November 1997, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001229

    Original file (AR20080001229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007970

    Original file (AR20090007970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...