Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003784
Original file (AR20080003784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/03/10	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Fom 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NA   Date: 040324
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 040603   Chapter: 8     AR: 635-200
Reason: Pregnancy	   RE:     SPD: KDF   Unit/Location: 549th MP Co, Fort Stewart, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 000824    Current ENL Term: 5 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	03 Yrs, 09Mos, 10Days ?????
Total Service:  		03 Yrs, 09Mos, 10Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 31B10 Military Police   GT: 101   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Germany/Southwest Asia   Combat: Kuwait/Iraq (030308-031215)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ASR. OSR 

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Nampa, ID
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
        Evidence of record shows that on  24 March 2004, the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 8,  AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy.  On 24 March 2004, the unit commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and indicated that this was a standard pregnancy separation with no extenuating circumstances or pertinent issues.  The separation authority approved the separation action with general, under honorable conditions discharge.
        
       
       
       

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
             Army Regulation 635-200, provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 8, established policy procedures, and provides authority for voluntarily separation of enlisted women because of pregnancy.  This Chapter applies to all Active Army enlisted women and ARNGUS and USAR enlisted women ordered to AD or ADT, except for ARNGUS and USAR Soldiers found to be pregnant upon entry on IADT, to whom paragraph 5-11 applies.  If an individual is beyond entry-level status, her service will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions.
       

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents she submitted, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper.  Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 8, paragraph 8-3b, states that prior to characterization of service as under honorable conditions, the Soldier will be advised of the specific factors in the service record that warrants such a characterization, using the notification procedure.  In view of the aforementioned, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper and recommends to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the applicant's characterization of service to fully honorable.  However, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable.  

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 7 January 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service is improper.  The Board determined that the applicant was not properly notified of the specific reason for issuing a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 8, paragraph 8-3b, states that prior to characterization of service as under honorable conditions, the Soldier will be advised of the specific factors in the service record that warrants such a characterization, using the notification procedure.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable.  However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.













 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 5    No change 0
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080003784
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012023

    Original file (AR20060012023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy, with an honorable discharge. That DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008525

    Original file (AR20060008525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 3 Mos, 19 Days ????? The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 31 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006814

    Original file (AR20060006814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 01 Mos, 26 Days ????? Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy, with an honorable discharge. That DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010309

    Original file (AR20100010309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050202 Discharge Received: Date: 050316 Chapter: 5-13 AR: 635-200 Reason: Personality Disorder RE: SPD: JFX Unit/Location: C Btry, 1-1st ADA, Fort Bliss, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011714

    Original file (AR20060011714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 26 October 2005, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendation of the Board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011284

    Original file (AR20070011284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since Active Army duty I have almost finished my associate’s degree, have been in the Army National Guard for two years now and did one tour with them and just extended for another tour. I think the main reason my discharge should be upgraded is because of the circumstances surrounding my discharge and the fact that I was treated unfairly, again I wasn’t barred from re-enlistment and I was discharged on the date of my ETS, for family problems. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020006

    Original file (AR20090020006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 March 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The record contains a Military Police Report dated 7 September 2008. b. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000041042

    Original file (2000041042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 February 1987, the applicant returned her completed pregnancy counseling checklist and elected separation by reason of pregnancy under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable voted not to change it.3. AR Number: 2000041042 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000814 A0113 Character of Service: HD A0100 Date of Discharge: 870404 Authority: AR 635-200 C8 Reason: A2200 Results of Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002066871

    Original file (2002066871.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: EARNEST C. SMITH, JR. Lieutenant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010080

    Original file (AR20090010080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 29 June 2004, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...