Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/07/14 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states: "When I agreed to this "Honorable" discharge I was told that the separation code "JFV" would not hender my efforts to seek employment in the civilian world. June of 2009 I completed CDL Training but have been denied employment because of this separation code. A recuiter at Lima Ohio, SFC B. (redacted), explained to me that the JFV code is no longer used. I am asking for an updated code be placed on my DD Form 214 that completes my former CO's promise that a separation code that will not hinder my efforts to seek employment."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 060919 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: OHARNG ELE JFHQ FWD 16, Fort Bliss, TX
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 37
Current ENL Date: 050802/OAD Current ENL Term: NIF Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 01Mos, 18Days ?????
Total Service: 14 Yrs, 07Mos, 01Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR-851108-860804/NA
RA-860805-900803/HD
ARNG-900804-931107/HD
ARNG-000218-050801/NA
Highest Grade: E5 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 14S10/Avenger Crewmember GT: NIF EDU: NIF Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AGCM, NDSM-(w/BS), GWOTSM, NCOPDR, ASR, AFRM-(w/M Device), EIB
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214, (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, for condition not a disability, with an honorable discharge. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFV (i.e., condition, not a disability), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in his/her service that warrant such characterization.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant's DD Form 214.
The applicants record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicants signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and Government regularity is presumed in the discharge process. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of condition, not a disability, with an honorable separation of service and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.
The analyst noted the applicant's issues reference his separation code hindering his efforts to seek employment and that he was told his current separation was no longer used. However, records show that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Condition, Not a Disability, and the separation code is "JFV." Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes. The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized. There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation. Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the narrative reason for discharge and SPD Code were both proper and equitable, and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 24 May 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NGB Form 22 and DD Form 214.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 0
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20090012498
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028745
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 100709 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200 Reason: Condition, Not a Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: Company H, 232nd Trainee MC, Fort Sam Houston, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011254
Applicant Name: ????? Army policy states that the service of personnel separated under this paragraph will be characterized as honorable, general, under honorable conditions, or uncharacterized if in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023442
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue of changing the narrative reason for discharge to medical disability; however, the narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement, VA disability documents and a DD Form 214.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005718
Applicant Name: ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, by reason of physical condition, not a disability, with a characterization of service of honorable, and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Condition, Not A Disability" and the separation code is "JFV."
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011860
The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, which were: adjustment disorder with depressed and anxious mood, this condition could impair unit readiness and safety, and potentially interfere with his ability to effectively perform his military duties, and recommended that he be discharge with an entry level uncharacterized separation of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110021900
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020042
The Applicant states in his DD Form 293, "I am requesting that my discharge be changed due to the fact that i served my Country and the United Stated Army Honorably and with integrity, loyalty and dedication to duty. Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021646
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "My military discharge was not a condition, I do not have any condition from any doctor inside the military, or outside the military and I did not admit to any condition. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 September 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018938
Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends the applicants request for an upgrade of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004701
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant's DD Form 214. Therefore, the analyst recommends to the Board that the reason and separation authority for discharge and the characterization of service...