Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009428
Original file (AR20060009428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 060705	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 021213
Discharge Received:     Date: 021219   
Chapter: 15    AR: 635-200
Reason: Homosexual Admission
RE:     SPD: JRB
Unit/Location: A Company, 795th Military Police Battalion, Fort Leonard Wood, Mo 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  841108  
Current ENL Date: 021107    Current ENL Term: 05 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01Mos, 13Days ?????
Total Service:  00 Yrs, 01Mos, 13Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E1
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 103   EDU: NIF   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      Evidence of record shows that on 20 November 2002, the applicant admitted in a sworn statement that he was homosexual and had engaged in homosexual/bisexual acts.  On 13 December 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge.  The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service.

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 15 of that regulation states that active homosexuality is incompatible with military service and provides, in pertinent part, for the separation of members who actively engage in homosexual conduct or who, by their statements, demonstrate a tendency to engage in homosexual conduct.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry-level status.  

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the applicant's characterization of service.  The analyst carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant voluntarily admitted in a sworn statement that he was homosexual.  In view of the foregoing his commanding officer initiated the applicant’s separation under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct with service uncharacterized.  Subsequently, the separation authority properly approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized.  A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  A general discharge is not authorized under entry level status conditions.  The analyst determined the applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 4, which indicates that the applicant was separated from his last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualifier and that he is ineligible for reenlistment.  Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommend the Board vote to deny relief in this case.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 12 June 2007              
Location: Atlanta

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 0    No change 5   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.





















Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


MARY E. SHAW				DATE: 25 June 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060009428

Applicant Name:  Mr.        
______________________________________________________________________


Page 5 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010871

    Original file (AR20080010871.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006016

    Original file (AR20060006016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification Signature and Date Approval...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002555

    Original file (AR20080002555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012510

    Original file (AR20090012510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 011003 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct RE: SPD: JGA Unit/Location: A Co, 30th AG Bn, Fort Benning, GA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003409

    Original file (AR20080003409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level status. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007404

    Original file (AR20060007404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008190

    Original file (AR20060008190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 4 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010911

    Original file (AR20080010911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011766

    Original file (AR20070011766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct for making a statement admitting that she is bisexual and could not abide by the Army's homosexual policy, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015941

    Original file (AR20080015941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army...