Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006814
Original file (AR20060006814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 060511	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 041009   
Chapter: 8    AR: 635-200
Reason: Pregnancy
RE:     SPD: MDF
Unit/Location: HHD 141st Signal Bn APO AE 09096 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  841125  
Current ENL Date: 020814    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 01 Mos, 26 Days ?????
Total Service:  02 Yrs, 01 Mos, 26 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E2
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92A10 Automated Log Spec   GT: 120   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Germany   Combat: Iraq (030429-040702)
Decorations/Awards: AAM, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ASR
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy, with an honorable discharge.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of MDF (i.e., pregnancy or childbirth), with a reentry (RE) code of "3."  

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 8 provides for the voluntary separation of enlisted woman because of pregnancy.  Service of enlisted woman separated under the provisions of Chapter 8 will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions unless the soldier in an entry level status.  This Chapter applies to all Active Army enlisted women and ARNGUS and USAR enlisted women ordered to AD or ADT, except for ARNGUS and USAR Soldiers found to be pregnant upon entry on IADT, to whom paragraph 5-11 applies.
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to her release from active duty.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of service granted and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  That DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  There is no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst noted the applicant’s issues; however, did not find said issues sufficiently mitigating to warrant a change to the narrative reason for discharge. The Army Discharge Review Board is not empowered to return former service members to active duty.  The Board may only change the characterization or reason for discharge.  If the applicant desires to reenlist, she should contact the local recruiter to determine her eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes. The analyst determined that the narrative reason for separation was both proper and equitable. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 21 March 2007              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      	Change     No change    (Character)
		 			       	Change     No change    (Reason)
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.






















Case report reviewed and verified by: Mr. Kenneth McFarley, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


MARY E. SHAW				DATE: 26 March 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060006814

Applicant Name:  Ms.       
______________________________________________________________________


Page 5 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012023

    Original file (AR20060012023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy, with an honorable discharge. That DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013131

    Original file (AR20070013131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. While the applicant's specific facts for which she may have received a general discharge are not contained in the available record, the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include her two combat deployments and the lack of any evidence of misconduct as her DD Form 214 indicates she was discharged as an E-4 mitigated the possible discrediting entry. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005956

    Original file (AR20080005956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008525

    Original file (AR20060008525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 3 Mos, 19 Days ????? The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 31 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013070

    Original file (AR20090013070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? That DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016747

    Original file (AR20070016747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was voluntarily discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200 by reason of pregnancy or childbirth, with an honorable characterization of service. The analyst carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and determined that the applicant would have voluntarily requested separation under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, due to pregnancy or childbirth. Certification Signature Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007786

    Original file (AR20080007786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The analyst carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and determined that the applicant voluntarily requested separation under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, due to pregnancy. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005801

    Original file (AR20120005801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states "Upon my Separation I was pregnant, and requested to get separated early based off the fact that my due date was my ETS date. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003784

    Original file (AR20080003784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and indicated that this was a standard pregnancy separation with no extenuating circumstances or pertinent issues. Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 8, paragraph 8-3b, states that prior to characterization of service as under honorable conditions, the Soldier will be advised of the specific factors in the service record that...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016303

    Original file (AR20130016303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was discharged as a PFC/E-3. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, the issue the applicant submitted is not a matter upon which the Army Discharge Review Board grants a change in the narrative reason because it raises no matter of fact, law, procedure, or discretion related to the...