PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Honorable

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  900829

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 14, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Misconduct-Pattern of Misconduct

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           AAM
    a.  Period entered for: 3 Years                GCMDL
    b.  Entry date: 890926                         ASR
    c.  Age: 23 Years   DOB: 660331                OSR


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT: 83                                 3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E4
         0 Year(s)  11 Month(s)  4 Day(s)

                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data


Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge
      RA    850816     890925     Honorable




                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 6 August 1990, Orders 207-6, DA,
55th Personnel Service Company; APO, New York, discharged the applicant
from the regular Army, effective date: 29 August 1990.  The record contains
a properly constituted DD form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of
Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct, with a
characterization of service of honorable.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214
shows a Separation Code of JKM (i.e., misconduct-pattern of misconduct).
The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s discharge
are not contained in the available records.

      b.  On 29 August 1990, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 11 months, and 4 days of active
military service in the period under review and had a total of 5 years, and
15 days of active military service.

      c.  It appears that the applicant’s discharge was approved as a
general, under honorable conditions.  However, someone involved in the
discharge process erroneously changed the applicant’s characterization of
service to honorable on the DD Form 214.  It is the policy of the Board not
to correct an administrative error if the correction would result in a less
favorable action to the applicant.  Therefore, the Board will not change
the applicant’s characterization of service on the current DD Form 214.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 040210.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, DC on 20 October
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          ( X )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

        Board Issue:  2)  The narrative reason for separation is
              inequitable.

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason


2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (2)  The issue is accepted.  Regulations currently in effect list
the reason for the applicant’s discharge as misconduct.  Accordingly, the
Board voted to change the narrative reason on the DD Form 214 to
misconduct.  Other than the foregoing modification to the reason for
separation, the Board found the reason for separation to be both proper and
equitable and voted not to change it further.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The applicant’s record is void of the
specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his
discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a
properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty).  This document identifies the reason and characterization of
the discharge and the Board presumed Government regularity in the discharge
process.  That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged
under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Paragraph 14-12b, by reason
of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of
honorable.  The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and
regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected
throughout the separation process.  See response to issue 2 above.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      (   ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      ( X ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to Misconduct
            under Chapter 14, AR 635-200.
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       5         0
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
MR. RON WILLIAMS
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis      Date:  20 October 2004

     The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):

           ( X ) Change the narrative reason for discharge to “Misconduct,”
                 under Chapter 14, AR 635-200.


                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2004104173                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A9442
Date of Review:  041020                                   A9301
Character of Service:  HD                                 A9217
Date of Discharge:  900829                                A0100
Authority:  AR 635-200 C14
Reason:  A6750
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  MD 5-0 A







                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr    X                       X       

    2.      Mbr    X                       X       

    3.      Mbr    X                       X       

    4.      Mbr    X                       X       

    5.      PO     X                       X