DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Army Discharge Review Board
1901 South Bell Street
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
1 April 2005
Office of the President
After careful review of your application, military records and all
other available evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board determined that
you were properly and equitably discharged. Accordingly, your request for
a change in the character and/or reason of your discharge is denied.
You may reapply to the Army Discharge Review Board for a personal
appearance hearing and/or you may apply to the Army Board for Correction of
Military Records. Enclosed are the necessary applications for requesting a
review from both boards. If you choose to apply to the Army Board for
Correction of Military Records you must do so within three years from the
date of this letter.
Be advised that the Army Discharge Review Board operates on a 15-year
statute of limitations from the date of discharge; therefore, you must
reapply within this time frame for a hearing.
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not
responsive to the issues raised, or does not otherwise agree with the
decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a
complaint in accordance with Enclosure 5 of that Directive. The complaint
procedure does not permit you to challenge the merits of the decision, but
is designed solely to ensure that the decisional document meets applicable
requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD
Directive 1332.28 by writing to: Army Review Board Agency, Attention:
(Reading Room), The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-1809.
Sincerely,
Robert L. House
Colonel, U.S. Army
President
Enclosure
CF
MILITARY REVIEW BOARDS
Case Report & Directive
PART I - IDENTIFICATION DATA
NAME: ADDRESS:
PHONE:
COUNSEL: ADDRESS:
PHONE:
ALTERNATE PERSON(S) TO BE NOTIFIED: ADDRESS:
RELATIONSHIP: PHONE:
TYPE REPORT:
( X ) Original
( ) Addendum
REMARKS
Case Management Data
( X ) Response to other correspondence required upon completion of case.
( ) DD Form 149 in file. Send case to ABCMR.
OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 22 May 98 Cover Sheet
PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 040106
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM NCOPDRw/Num3
a. Period entered for: NIF* AAM(2nd Awd) ASR
b. Entry date: 030210 ARCAM(4th Awd)
ARCOTR(3rd Awd)
c. Age: 34 Years DOB: 680711 NDSM(2nd Awd) KLM(SA)
d. Educational level: HS Grad SWASMw/2BSS KLM(K)
e. Aptitude area score: AFRM
GT: NIF 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E8
0 Year(s) 10 Month(s) 27 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF
*NOTE: Applicant was a member of the USAR ordered to active duty in
support of Enduring Freedom/Iraqi Freedom. Activation orders not in file;
last available USAR reenlistment contract in record dated 021102 for 3
years.
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
031211 Dereliction of duty by willfully failing to safeguard from
assault and abuse an Iraqi detainee (030512); maltreat an
injured Iraqi detainee by knocking him to the ground,
repeatedly kicking him in the groin, abdomen, and head,
and then encouraging your subordinate soldiers to do the
same (030512) (General Officer)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
USAR 860407 940310 Honorable
USAR 940311 970110 Honorable
USAR 970111 021101 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence in the official record shows that the applicant was
initially charged under the UCMJ with multiple specifications of
dereliction of duty; abuse of Iraqi detainees; making false official
statements; endeavoring to impede an investigation; and conspiring to
obstruct justice. On 7 January 2004, the charges and their specifications
were dismissed with prejudice, and the applicant was administratively
processed for separation under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by
reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense. The administrative
discharge documentation is not in the official record, with the exception
of the approval document from the General Court-Martial Convening
Authority. He directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge
under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-
commission of a serious offense. The record also contains a properly
constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty) which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature. Her DD Form
214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14,
AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a
characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. She
was reduced to the lowest enlisted grade.
b. On 6 January 2004, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 10 months and 27 days of active
military service in the period under review and had a total of 17 years, 8
months and
29 days of active military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040721, with multiple enclosure(s).
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, D.C. on 30 March
2005.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) and (2) The issues are rejected. The Board carefully examined
the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under
review. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable
service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and
the seriousness of the offenses. The commission of serious offenses
compelled the applicant’s command to consider her for separation.
Retention is normally only considered in exceptionally meritorious cases
when clearly in the best interests of the Army. Because of the applicant’s
serious misconduct, she diminished the quality of her service below that
meriting a fully honorable or general discharge. The applicant provided no
independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's
action was erroneous or that her service mitigated the misconduct. The
Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met
and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the
separation process. The Board, being convinced that the reason for
discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and
equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20040005255 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217
Date of Review: 050330 A0139
Character of Service: UD A0101
Date of Discharge: 040106
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6730
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040005578
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000765
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge USAR 000926 030209 NA (Concurrent Service) PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040002862
SECTION B - Prior Service Data See #8 Remarks (above) Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The Board found that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted not to change it. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | AR20050009942
SECTION B - Prior Service Data See #8 Remarks (above) Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 31 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635- 200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 18 February 2005, based on equity,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105015
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 991006 020106 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040008361
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 10 June 2005 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003098255
On 12 May 2003, the applicant was discharged. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050005102
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 9 December 2005 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | AR20050004315
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 28 October 2005 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | AR20050005966
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 21 October 2005 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions...