PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 911009
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200
b. Reason: For the Good of the Service-In Lieu of Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
NDSM
a. Period entered for: 4 Years ASR
b. Entry date: 910206
c. Age: 21 Years DOB: 691009
d. Educational level: 15 Years
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 103 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E2
0 Years 9 Months 3 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 910503-910731
910415-910418
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
ARNGUS 880303 880630 NA
IADT 880701 880904 Uncharacterized
ARNGUS 880905 890621 NA
ADT 890622 890805 Uncharacterized
ARNGUS 890806 910205 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was reported
AWOL, effective 3 May 1991 DFR’d on 3 June 1991. On 31 July 1991, the
applicant surrendered to the military authorities at Fort Drum, NY. He was
subsequently transferred to the Personnel Control Facility (PCF) at Fort
Dix, NJ for further processing. On 6 August 1991, the applicant was
charged with his previous AWOL from 15-18 April 1991 and his latest AWOL
incident from 3 May – 31 July 1991. On 6 August 1991, the applicant
consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing,
discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial
by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the
offense, or a lesser-included offense. Further, the applicant indicated
that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable
conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect
on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The applicant submitted a statement
in his own behalf. On 6 August 1991, the applicant was placed on excess
leave pending completion of his administrative discharge proceeding under
Chapter 10, AR 635-200. On 28 August 1991, the unit commander recommended
approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The
separation authority approved the discharge with a general, under honorable
conditions discharge.
b. On 9 October 1991, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 9 months and 3 days of active
military service (which included 65 days of excess leave), and accrued 88
days of lost time in the period under review. He had a total of 3 years, 8
months, and 6 days of total military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040517, with multiple enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 6 December
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (2) The discharge is improper.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(2) The issue is accepted. The evidence of record shows that an
authority not authorized to approve the applicant’s discharge approved the
discharge. In view of the forgoing, the Board determined that the
discharge is improper. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant full relief
in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable
and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial
Authority. This action entails a restoration of grade to E2; however, does
not entail a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) See Paragraph 3, below.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( ) Proper.
( X ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
Honorable.
( X ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to Secretarial Authority
under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
( ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 5 0
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 10 December 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to
Honorable.
( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to
Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: This action entails a restoration of grade to E2; however, does
not entail a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20040001985 INDEX NUMBERS: A0108
Date of Review: 041206 A0154
Character of Service: GD A1200
Date of Discharge: 911009
Authority: AR 635-200 C10
Reason: A7100
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20030003919
Evidence of record shows that on 19 November 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—patterns of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant full relief by changing the characterization of service to honorable and changing the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003083885
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002078077
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 by reason of for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Voting record: Change No Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 5 0 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003094081
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. PART VII -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040009028
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. The Board noted that because the applicant was in an entry-level status at the time of his AWOL, the approving authority had only two options as to characterization of service. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001053979
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 6 April 2001 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040005731
On 16 December 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002078259
Evidence of record shows that on 3 October 1991, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003098700
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, NGR 600-200, by reason of misconduct-unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Remarks: This action entails a restoration of grade to E2 and a change to the applicant’s discharge from the Reserve of the Army to reflect a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L....
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105855
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge ARNGUS 901129 920611 Uncharacterized PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by...