PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 000419
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200
b. Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): Records Review (020911)
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ASR
a. Period entered for: 6 Years
b. Entry date: 990602
c. Age: 18 Years DOB: 900830
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 116 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E2
0 Years 9 Months 15 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 000214-000316
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From
Active Duty), item 12a, shows date entered AD this period as 990421,
however, DD Form 4/3 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows 990602.
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence of record shows that on 8 March 2000, the applicant
was charged with wrongfully using marijuana (between 000101-000201);
behaving disrespectfully towards a CPT (000207); disobeying a lawful
command from a 1LT (000207); disobeying a lawful command from a CPT, two
specifications (000207 and between 000208-000214); disobeying a lawful
order from a SSG (000207) and SFC, two specifications (000207); and
disrespectful in language towards a SSG (000207) and SGT (000211). The
applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in
writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu
of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt
to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant
indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than
honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a
significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The applicant
did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit and intermediate
commanders all reviewed the applicant’s request for discharge and
recommended approval with an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. On 17 March 2000, the separation authority approved the
discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and
directed the applicant be reduced to the lowest enlisted pay grade.
b. On 19 April 2000, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 9 months and 15 days of active
military service and accrued 31 days of lost time in the period under
review.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030917, with one (1) enclosure.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( )Records review ( X ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 3 May 2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: one (1) document.
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (3) The discharge is inequitable.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(3) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review
and heard his testimony. There was a full consideration of all faithful
and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent
thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. While the Board does not
condone the applicant’s misconduct, the Board determined that the discharge
was inequitable based on the nature of the offenses. Accordingly, the
Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization
of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for
separation to Secretarial Authority. This action entails a change to the
RE code to “1” and a restoration of the applicant’s grade to PV2/E-2.
(1) and (2) See paragraph 3, below.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
responses to the remaining issues is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
___________________________.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to ____________________
under _____________________.
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
Honorable.
( X ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to Secretarial
Authority
under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 5 0
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RON WILLIAMS
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 7 May 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change the characterization of discharge to Honorable.
( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Secretarial
Authority, Under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: This action entails a change to the RE code to “1” and a
restoration of the applicant’s grade to PV2/E-2.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2003096740 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 040503 A1200
Character of Service: UD A0100
Date of Discharge: 000419
Authority: AR 635-200 C10
Reason: A7000
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 4-1 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001060356
The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 26 May 2000, the applicant was discharged. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3.
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000039191
Further, the record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) that indicates that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and the Reserve of the Army under the provisions of NGR 600-200 with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003090613
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000046406
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003099676
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 23 March 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 20 May 2001,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003090744
Evidence of record shows that on 14 May 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004103015
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions, with a separation code of KFS, and a RE code of 4. b. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant would have been aware of that prior to requesting discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035818
The evidence of record shows that on 17 March 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 7, AR 135-178 by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, with an honorable discharge. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and Army National Guard. The Board carefully examined the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001059534
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. AR Number: 2001059534 INDEX NUMBERS: A0113 Date of Review: 010926 A9500 Character of Service: EL Date of Discharge: 000419 Authority: AR 635-200 C5 Reason: A3100 Results of Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003097384
The separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The Board noted that the applicant was in entry- level status when he departed his unit in an AWOL status. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 10 June 2004 The...