Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002076894
Original file (2002076894.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  General, Under Honorable Conditions 

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  970729   

3.  Authority for separation:

	a.  Regulation:  Chapter 14, AR 635-200    

	b.  Reason:  Misconduct-Abuse of Illegal Drugs      

4.  Prior review(s):  RECORDS/980918


PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.	Service data:                              2.  Awards and decorations:
			                          ARCOM        AFEM
a.  Period entered for:  3 Years               AAM(3) 
b.  Entry date:  951201                        GCMDL(2)
c.  Age:  25 Years   DOB:  700712              HSM        
d.  Educational level:  HS Grad                SWASMw/2BSS
e.  Aptitude area score:                       
	    GT:  118                               3.  Highest grade achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E5
         1 Year  7 Months  29 Days             
                                               
                                               4.  Performance evaluations:  
                                                   NONE
                                                 

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE
                                                                    
    Status       Inclusive dates                       
	AWOL                                                               

	Mil conf                                                           

	Civil conf                                                         

	Other                                                              


6.  Nonjudicial punishment: 

	Date 	Offense(s)
	961210    Wrongfully used cocaine (960902)


7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

	a.  SCM:  
		Date   Offense(s)
                     
	
	b.  SPCM:  
		Date   Offense(s)


	c.  GCM:	 
		Date   Offense(s)


8.	Remarks:  NONE


SECTION B - Prior Service Data

Other discharge(s):

	Service	From	To	Type Discharge
	RA            900228    940911           HD
	RA            940912    951130           HD





PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

	a.  Evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD).  The applicant was advised of his rights, consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested a hearing by a board of officers, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander recommended separation from the service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a GD.  On 13 May 1997 an administrative separation board convened to hear the applicant’s case, at which the applicant appeared with his counsel.  The board recommended separation for misconduct-commission of a serious offense by engaging in the wrongfully use of cocaine with a GD.  On 20 June 1997, the separation authority approved the board’s findings and directed that the applicant be discharged with a GD.  

	b.  On 29 July 1997, the applicant was discharged with a GD.  At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 7 months, and 29 days of his current enlistment and a total of 7 years, 5 months and 2 days of military service.

	c.  The applicant’s record shows that he reenlisted for the period of service under review on 1 December 1995.  At the time of his reenlistment he had completed 6 years, 9 months, and 3 days of honorable service and attained the rank of sergeant/E-5.  The applicant had also earned the Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze service stars for duty in Saudi Arabia; the Humanitarian Service Medal; the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in Haiti; the Army Commendation Medal; and 3 awards of the Army Achievement Medal.  The applicant was processed for separation for the illegal use of cocaine based on a positive urinalysis.  His case was heard by an administrative separation board which recommended his discharge for commission of a serious offense based on the cocaine use.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.


SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

	A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 020731.
	A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
	B-l:  Other Documents: NONE



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


	a. Type requested:
	   (   ) Records review             ( X ) Hearing

	b. Type Held:
	   (   )Records review              ( X ) Hearing
	                                    (   ) Tender Offer

	c. Review/hearing location and date:  Dallas, TX on 10 April 2003.

	d. Appearance by:
	   Applicant                 ( X ) Yes   (   ) No
	   Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

	e.  Applicant testified:     ( X ) Yes   (   ) No
	
	f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
	
	g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
	                                                
2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:  

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

	    ( X )	Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
	    (   )	Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
	    ( X )	Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:

        Board Issues:  (2)  The characterization of service is too harsh.
                       (3)  The narrative reason for separation is inequitable.

	b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:


	a.  Propriety:	The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

	b.  Equity:	The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.

        (2)  The issue is accepted.  The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.  There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infraction of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offense.  The Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the characterization of service was inequitable because the applicant's generally acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty mitigated the discrediting entry in the service record.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable.  

        (3)  The issue is accepted.  Regulations currently in effect list the reason for the applicant’s discharge as misconduct.  Accordingly, the Board voted to change the narrative reason on the DD Form 214 to misconduct.  

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  Notwithstanding the foregoing decision by the Board, the Board determined that the applicant’s narrative reason for separation, as modified above, is both proper and equitable and requires no further change.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE




PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.	Board conclusion(s):

	The discharge was:

	( X )	Proper.
	(   )	Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to                                     .
	(   )	Improper as to reason.  Change reason to                         under                      .

	(   )	Equitable.
	( X )	Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to Honorable.
	( X )	Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to Misconduct
		under Chapter 14, AR 635-200.
	(   )	Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                         .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
	            Reason       5         0  
    Characterization       5         0   

	  The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE  

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified	

                          	
MR. RIVERA       
Case Reviewing Official	


PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis      Date:  18 April 2003          

     The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s):

           ( X )  Change characterization of discharge to
                  Honorable.
           ( X )	Change reason and authority for discharge to
       	Misconduct, Chapter 14, AR 635-200.

SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




JOHN F. LONG    
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge              	C - Other 
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AD Number:  2002076894                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A9218
Date of Review:  030410                                   A9202
Character of Service:  GD                                 A9442
Date of Discharge:  970729                                A0113
Authority:  AR 635-200 C14                                
Reason:  A6770                                            
Results of Board Action/                                  
Vote/Affirmation:  HD 5-0 A                               










PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason         Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC    HON   UHC   NC   UNCHAR
    1. LTC LONG, JOHN F.	Mbr    X            X                   

    2. COL MINNIEFIELD, ANITA R.	Mbr    X            X                   

    3. COL TALLON, CARYL T.	Mbr    X            X                   

    4. 	Mbr    X            X                   

    5. COL MOORE, SPURGEON A.	PO     X            X                   




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999018582

    Original file (1999018582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999018582...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040001630

    Original file (AR20040001630.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge. On 28 October 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998012176

    Original file (1998012176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1998012176 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990210 A9500 Character...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999028984

    Original file (AR1999028984.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 11 August 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason alcohol abuse-rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge (HD). The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999026164

    Original file (1999026164.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 May 1990, the applicant was discharged with a GD. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 11 June 1999 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000038822

    Original file (2000038822.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board, being convinced...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024878

    Original file (1999024878.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999024878 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990421...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999024586

    Original file (AR1999024586.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board determined the narrative reason for the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable at the time of his discharge; however, regulations currently in effect list the reason for the applicant’s discharge as misconduct. ( X ) Change the reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct under Chapter 14, AR 635-200.SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024993

    Original file (1999024993.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002078829

    Original file (2002078829.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions (GD). Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case...