PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 970729
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct-Abuse of Illegal Drugs
4. Prior review(s): RECORDS/980918
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
ARCOM AFEM
a. Period entered for: 3 Years AAM(3)
b. Entry date: 951201 GCMDL(2)
c. Age: 25 Years DOB: 700712 HSM
d. Educational level: HS Grad SWASMw/2BSS
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 118 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E5
1 Year 7 Months 29 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
961210 Wrongfully used cocaine (960902)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 900228 940911 HD
RA 940912 951130 HD
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD). The applicant was advised of his rights, consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested a hearing by a board of officers, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander recommended separation from the service. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a GD. On 13 May 1997 an administrative separation board convened to hear the applicants case, at which the applicant appeared with his counsel. The board recommended separation for misconduct-commission of a serious offense by engaging in the wrongfully use of cocaine with a GD. On 20 June 1997, the separation authority approved the boards findings and directed that the applicant be discharged with a GD.
b. On 29 July 1997, the applicant was discharged with a GD. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 7 months, and 29 days of his current enlistment and a total of 7 years, 5 months and 2 days of military service.
c. The applicants record shows that he reenlisted for the period of service under review on 1 December 1995. At the time of his reenlistment he had completed 6 years, 9 months, and 3 days of honorable service and attained the rank of sergeant/E-5. The applicant had also earned the Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze service stars for duty in Saudi Arabia; the Humanitarian Service Medal; the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in Haiti; the Army Commendation Medal; and 3 awards of the Army Achievement Medal. The applicant was processed for separation for the illegal use of cocaine based on a positive urinalysis. His case was heard by an administrative separation board which recommended his discharge for commission of a serious offense based on the cocaine use.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANTS SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicants DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020731.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( )Records review ( X ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Dallas, TX on 10 April 2003.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
Board Issues: (2) The characterization of service is too harsh.
(3) The narrative reason for separation is inequitable.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infraction of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offense. The Board does not condone the applicants misconduct; however, determined that the characterization of service was inequitable because the applicant's generally acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty mitigated the discrediting entry in the service record. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable.
(3) The issue is accepted. Regulations currently in effect list the reason for the applicants discharge as misconduct. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the narrative reason on the DD Form 214 to misconduct.
(1) The issue is rejected. Notwithstanding the foregoing decision by the Board, the Board determined that the applicants narrative reason for separation, as modified above, is both proper and equitable and requires no further change.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to Honorable.
( X ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to Misconduct
under Chapter 14, AR 635-200.
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 5 0
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 18 April 2003
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to
Honorable.
( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to
Misconduct, Chapter 14, AR 635-200.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
JOHN F. LONG
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AD Number: 2002076894 INDEX NUMBERS: A9218
Date of Review: 030410 A9202
Character of Service: GD A9442
Date of Discharge: 970729 A0113
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6770
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR
1. LTC LONG, JOHN F. Mbr X X
2. COL MINNIEFIELD, ANITA R. Mbr X X
3. COL TALLON, CARYL T. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. COL MOORE, SPURGEON A. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999018582
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999018582...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040001630
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge. On 28 October 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing...
ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998012176
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1998012176 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990210 A9500 Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999028984
On 11 August 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason alcohol abuse-rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge (HD). The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999026164
On 29 May 1990, the applicant was discharged with a GD. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 11 June 1999 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000038822
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board, being convinced...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024878
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999024878 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990421...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999024586
The Board determined the narrative reason for the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable at the time of his discharge; however, regulations currently in effect list the reason for the applicant’s discharge as misconduct. ( X ) Change the reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct under Chapter 14, AR 635-200.SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024993
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002078829
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions (GD). Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case...