Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000045316
Original file (2000045316.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: Honorable

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 980708

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 8, AR 635-200

          b. Reason: Pregnancy
4. Prior review(s): NONE


PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                            NDSM
a. Period entered for: 4 Years ASR
b. Entry date: 960821
c. Age: 22 Years DOB: 740620
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
          GT: NIF 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E3
1 Year(s) 10 Month(s) 18 Day(s)

4. Performance evaluations:
NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

 Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
         Date     Offense(s)
        


7. Court-Martial data: NONE
         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

        
         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM: 
                  Date Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE

Other discharge(s):

          Service   From      To        Type Discharge





PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:

          a. On 18 June 1998 Department of the Army, Headquarters, 10 th Mountain Division (Light Infantry) and Fort Drum, Fort Drum, New York Orders 169-1004 reassigned the applicant to the United States Army transition point for transition processing. The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning events that led to her discharge from the Army. The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which was not authenticated by the applicant due to her unavailability to sign. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge as Chapter 8, AR 635-200, for pregnancy, with an honorable discharge.

         b. On 8 July 1998, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had 1 year, 10 months, and 18 days service on her current enlistment.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 8-1, provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. This Chapter established policy procedures, and provides authority for voluntarily separation of enlisted women because of pregnancy. This Chapter applies to all Active Army enlisted women and ARNGUS and USAR enlisted women ordered to AD or ADT, except for ARNGUS and USAR soldiers found to be pregnant upon entry on IADT, to whom paragraph 5-11 applies.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 000727.
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)



SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor



 a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing

         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 30 August 2000 .

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No

          e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
         b. Request: ( ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

          b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above:

 (1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 6, AR 635-200 for an inability to perform prescribed duties due to pregnancy. This voluntary separation was appropriate since the command determined that the applicant’s parental obligations interfered with the fulfillment of military responsibilities. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Accordingly, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change.

3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .

         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                       
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       

                                 
MS. WADE
Case Reviewing Official 

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


WILSON A. SHATZER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




EARNEST C. SMITH, JR.
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

 AR Number: 2000045316 INDEX NUMBERS: A1501
Date of Review: 000830 A0100
Character of Service: HD A9307
Date of Discharge: 980708
Authority: AR 635-200 C8
Reason: A2200
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A













PART IX - VOTING RECORD



 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr      X          X    

2.      Mbr      X          X    

3.      Mbr      X          X    

4.      Mbr      X          X    

5.      PO      X          X    






Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050006652

    Original file (20050006652.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Army Discharge Review Board 1901 South Bell Street Arlington, VA 22202-4508 23 December 2005 Office of the President After careful review of your application, military records and all other available evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board determined that you were properly and equitably discharged. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000041042

    Original file (2000041042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 February 1987, the applicant returned her completed pregnancy counseling checklist and elected separation by reason of pregnancy under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable voted not to change it.3. AR Number: 2000041042 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000814 A0113 Character of Service: HD A0100 Date of Discharge: 870404 Authority: AR 635-200 C8 Reason: A2200 Results of Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002066871

    Original file (2002066871.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: EARNEST C. SMITH, JR. Lieutenant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003095023

    Original file (2003095023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 July 1996, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy with a characterization of service of honorable. Type requested: ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1996 | 199600408.rtf

    Original file (199600408.rtf.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The authority and reason for discharge were stipulated in the separation documentation and acknowledged by the applicant. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. JOSEPH A. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003086236

    Original file (2003086236.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-patterns of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 26 June 2001, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004100700

    Original file (AR2004100700.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The Board, being convinced that the reason of discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003099846

    Original file (AR2003099846.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200 by reason of pregnancy, with a characterization of service of honorable. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105539

    Original file (AR2004105539.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635- 200 by reason of pregnancy, with a characterization of service of honorable. The evidence of record shows that the applicant voluntarily requested release from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms....

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040001316

    Original file (AR20040001316.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 9 November 1994, she submitted her request for voluntary separation under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. The Board was satisfied that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted not to change it. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of...