Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 99027467
Original file (99027467.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: UNCHAR

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 910813

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 11, AR 635-200

          b. Reason: Entry Level Status Performance and Conduct
4. Prior review(s): NONE


PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                            NONE
a. Period entered for: 8 Years
b. Entry date: 9106028
c. Age: 27 Years DOB: 680310
d. Educational level: GED
e. Aptitude area score:
          GT: 102 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E2
0 Year(s) 2 Month(s) 12 Day(s)

4. Performance evaluations:
NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

 Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment:

         Date     Offense(s)
         910619 Disrespectful toward SGT (910613); FOLO, issued by SSG (910613); disrespectful in language toward SSG (undated)
         910724 Disrespectful in language toward SSG (910712); FOLO, issued by SSG (910712)

7. Court-Martial data: NONE
         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

        
         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM: 
                  Date Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data

Other discharge(s):

          Service   From      To        Type Discharge
         USAR 900309 900620 UNCHAR



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:

          a. The evidence of record shows that on 24 July 1991, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, inability to adapt to the military lifestyle, with an entry level separation(uncharacterized) discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended approval with an honorable discharge and forwarded it through command channels to the separation authority. On 31 July 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated with an uncharacterized discharge.

         b. On 13 August 1991, the applicant was discharged with an uncharacterized discharge, under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level status performance and conduct. He was credited with 2 months, and 12 days active service on the enlistment under review.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11, of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided, for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status. This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or that they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service. The separation policy applies to soldiers who cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline. The regulation requires uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.

SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 990521.
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)



SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor



 a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing

         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 28 July 1999 .

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
          Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
         b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

          b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.

 (1) The issue is rejected. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he preformed his duties to the best of his ability, in spite of all his alleged physical problems. However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service for the period of enlistment under review, the Board determined that the characterization of the applicant’s service was appropriate. The Board noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry level status (ELS). The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. A soldier is in entry level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry level status is to provide the soldier a probationary period. Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry level status. A general discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions. A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The Board determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

 3. Response to item not addressed as decisional issue:

During the review of this case the Board did find an administrative error in the narrative reason for discharge contained on the applicant’s DD Form 214. Army regulations, in effect at the time of the applicant’s discharge, directed that the narrative reason for discharge for soldiers separated under these provisions be listed as “Entry Level Status”, not “Entry Level Status Performance and Conduct” as is entered on the applicant’s DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board directs, in Part VIII of this document, that this administrative correction be made.

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .

         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                       
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       

                                 
MR. RON WILLIAMS
Case Reviewing Official 

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

 TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 30 July 1999.

The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s):
( X )   Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: Correct the administrative error contained in Block Number 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of the DD Form 214 as indicated below:

Should Read: “Entry Level Status”.

SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


THOMAS J. ALLEN
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SUZANNE WALKER
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

 AR Number: 1999027467 INDEX NUMBERS: A9321
Date of Review: 990728 A9217
Character of Service: EL A0100
Date of Discharge: 910813
Authority: AR 635-200 C11
Reason: A2900
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A



PART IX - VOTING RECORD

 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr      X          X    

2.      Mbr      X          X    

3.      Mbr      X          X    

4.      Mbr      X          X    

5.      PO      X          X    





Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999026243

    Original file (1999026243.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that on 26 August 1985, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l1, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level status performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):During review of this case it was noted that there was an administrative error contained in item 24 (Character of Service) of the DD Form 214 (Certificate or Release...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700303

    Original file (199700303.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00303 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. 960513: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, entry level performance and conduct. CASE NO: AD97-00303 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name & Rank Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR X X X X X X X X X X OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 1 MAY 94 PAGE 7

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701314

    Original file (199701314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-01314 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. 921230: Applicant was discharged. CASE NO: AD97-01314 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR X X X X X X X X X X

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094683

    Original file (AR2003094683.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000956

    Original file (AR20040000956.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 28 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—patterns of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Minority views: NONE PART...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003093240

    Original file (AR2003093240.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Remarks: The applicant had prior service in the USAR; however, enlistment documents were not available in the official record. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040004828

    Original file (AR20040004828.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Army Discharge Review Board 1901 South Bell Street Arlington, VA 22202-4508 4 March 2005 Office of the President After careful review of your application, military records and all other available evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board determined that you were properly and equitably discharged. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025670

    Original file (1999025670.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999025670 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990526 A0100 Character...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700563

    Original file (199700563.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. 910712: Applicant was discharged. CASE NO: AD97-00563 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR X X X X X X X X X X

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999022349

    Original file (1999022349.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material...