Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700786
Original file (199700786.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                                    CASE NO: AD97-00786
PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Type of discharge (or characterization of service): UOHC

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 950725

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200

          b. Reason:       In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial

4. Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
 Type
AAM (1st OLC)
 a. Period entered for: 3 Years NDSM
b. Entry date: 931013 ASR
c. Age: 19 Years DOB: 740125 OSR
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area scores: ( X ) NIF/NA
         GT: 110 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Actual creditable service: 1 Year
6 Months 12 Days Grade
E3

4. Performance evaluations:
( X ) NONE

                                             CASE NO: AD97-00786
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence:

Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL 950221 - 950521
         Mil conf
         Civil conf
         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment:
         Nature Date
         Art 15 950215

7. Court-Martial data: ( X ) NONE
         

8.       Remarks: ( X ) NONE
SECTION B - Other Service Data

 1. Other discharge(s):

         Service Type
ARNG NA
 ADT UNCHAR
ARNG NA





         CASE NO: AD97-00786
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A - Analyst's Assessment

1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge:
950530: Applicant was charged with AWOL.
950530: Applicant consulted legal counsel, requested discharge under the
provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-
martial, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
950621: Separation authority approved separation with an under other than
honorable discharge.
950725: Applicant was discharged.

2. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity on DD Form 293 or incorporated by reference:
         See attached DD Form 293.

 3. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, undated.
B-1: DD Form 293, with three (3) enclosures as submitted by the applicant.



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION B - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
( X ) NONE
PART V - SUMMARY OF REVIEW HEARING


         a. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

        
         b. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: ( X ) NONE

                                    CASE NO: AD97-00786
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
        

b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

        b. Equity:       The parenthetical numbers below corresponds to the issue numbers on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(1, 2, 3) The issues are rejected. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of offenses punishable under the Uniform Code Of Military Justice with a punitive discharge. The Board noted that after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. By doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense of being AWOL for more than 30 days. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Finally, the Board considered the applicant's entire record of service for the period under review. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA

                            CASE NO: AD97-00786
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .
         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                        
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .

2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: CPCD
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: ( X ) NA

                                     CASE NO: AD97-00786
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       


                                 
LTC PHILLIPS
Post Hearing Reviewer   


PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
(X) NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION


Approval Authority:

EL CARTIO BARNES
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SHERRY HILL SARGENT
Major, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
 A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant     
       

INDEX RECORD:

AD9700786 970321 UD 950725 AR635-200 C10 A7100 NC 5-0 A
1 10 11 12 18 20 26 41 46 49 52

A9235 A0100 A9217 A9207
53 58 63 68

                           CASE NO: AD97-00786
PART IX - VOTING RECORD

 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1. MAJ WYRICK, JIMMY Mbr      X          X    

2. LTC PHILLIPS, JOHN Mbr      X          X    

3. LTC SMITH, LILLIAN Mbr      X          X    

4. COL ALLEN, THOMAS Mbr      X          X    

5. COL MATHEWS, WILLIAM PO      X          X    








Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701420

    Original file (199701420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Board Issue: (1) The characterization of service is too harsh. CASE NO: AD97-01420 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC WYRICK Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date: The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701436

    Original file (199701436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. CASE NO: AD97-01436 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-01436 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700631

    Original file (199700631.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00631 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 901222: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, did not meet procurement medical fitness standard- no disability. CASE NO: AD97-00631 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700261

    Original file (199700261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00261 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-00261 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC PHILLIPS Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board CASE NO: AD97-00261 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700744

    Original file (199700744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 920113: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of Separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, for unsatisfactory performance. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. CASE NO: AD97-00744 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700564

    Original file (199700564.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 931130: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct. CASE NO: AD97-00564 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701320

    Original file (199701320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-01320 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701385

    Original file (199701385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-01385 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700350

    Original file (199700350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2. CASE NO: AD97-00350 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC PHILLIPS Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board CASE NO: AD97-00350...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700143

    Original file (199700143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. CASE NO: AD97-00143 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.