Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700196
Original file (199700196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

                                    CASE NO: AD97-00196
PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 951215

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200

         b. Reason:       Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
a. Period entered for: 4 Years Type
b. Entry date: 930827 AAM C/A
c. Age: 18 Years DOB: 750821 NDSM
d. Educational level: HS Grad AFEM
e. Aptitude area scores: ( X ) NIF/NA ASR
          GT: 107 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Actual creditable service: 2 Years
3 Months 19 Days Grade
E2

4. Performance evaluations:
( X ) NONE

                                             CASE NO: AD97-00196
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: ( X ) NONE



6. Nonjudicial punishment:

         Nature Date
         Art 15 950911   

7. Court-Martial data: ( X ) NONE
         

8.       Remarks: ( X ) NONE
SECTION B - Other Service Data
(X) NONE







         CASE NO: AD97-00196
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A - Analyst's Assessment

1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge:
951108: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of
separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14,
AR 635-200, for misconduct. He was advised of his rights.
951130: Separation authority waived rehabilitation and approved
separation with a general discharge.
951215: Applicant was discharged.
         

2. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity on DD Form 293 or incorporated by reference:
         See attached DD Form 293.

 3. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 961028.
B-1: DD Form 293, with two(2) enclosures as submitted by the applicant.



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION B - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
( X ) NONE
PART V - SUMMARY OF REVIEW HEARING


         a. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

        
         b. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: ( X ) NONE

                                    CASE NO: AD97-00196
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
        

b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.



         b. Equity:       The parenthetical numbers below corresponds to the issue numbers on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(1, 2) The issues are rejected. Applicable regulations state that each case must be decided on an individual basis considering the unique facts and circumstances of that particular case. The Army Discharge Review Board can understand the applicant's situation; and congratulates the applicant on the many achievements since departing the Army. However, good post service conduct alone is not normally a basis which the ADRB grants relief, and it chose not to do so in this case. The applicant's discharge was appropriate because the quality of service determination at the time of discharge was consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By misconduct and poor duty performance the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.


3. Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA

                            CASE NO: AD97-00196
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .
         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                        
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .

2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: CPCD
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: ( X ) NA

                                     CASE NO: AD97-00196
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       


                                 
LTC PHILLIPS
Post Hearing Reviewer   


PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
(X) NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION


Approval Authority:

EL CARTIO BARNES
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SHERRY HILL SARGENT
Major, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant     

INDEX RECORD:

AD9700196 970321 GD 951215 AR635-200 C14 A6700 NC 5-0 A
1 10 11 12 18 20 26 41 46 49 52

A9217 A0100 A9221 A9447
53 58 63 68

                           CASE NO: AD97-00196
PART IX - VOTING RECORD

 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1. MAJ WYRICK, JIMMY Mbr      X          X    

2. LTC PHILLIPS, JOHN Mbr      X          X    

3. LTC SMITH, LILLIAN Mbr      X          X    

4. COL ALLEN, THOMAS Mbr      X          X    

5. COL MATHEWS, WILLIAM PO      X          X    








Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701305

    Original file (199701305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960130: Applicant was discharged. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700240

    Original file (199700240.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960122: Applicant was discharged.2. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700631

    Original file (199700631.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00631 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 901222: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, did not meet procurement medical fitness standard- no disability. CASE NO: AD97-00631 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701436

    Original file (199701436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. CASE NO: AD97-01436 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-01436 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700261

    Original file (199700261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00261 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-00261 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC PHILLIPS Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board CASE NO: AD97-00261 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700744

    Original file (199700744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 920113: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of Separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, for unsatisfactory performance. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. CASE NO: AD97-00744 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700564

    Original file (199700564.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 931130: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct. CASE NO: AD97-00564 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701320

    Original file (199701320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-01320 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700279

    Original file (199700279.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-00279 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700427

    Original file (199700427.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-00427 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.