Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001681
Original file (20150001681.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 17 September 2015 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001681 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he remains entitled to payment of a $20,000 Student Loan Repayment Plan (SLRP)) incentive.

2.  The applicant states that he reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in military occupational specialty (MOS) 42F (Human Resource Information System Management Specialist) and signed a contract specifically stating that he would receive a $20,000 SLRP incentive; however, he only received $10,000 because his MOS did not qualify for the $20,000 incentive.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his enlistment contract and his USAR Command’s denial of his request for an exception to policy (ETP) to retain the $20,000 incentive.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having prior enlisted service in the Regular Army, the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 20 February 2008 for a period of 6 years.  His record is void of an SLRP Addendum.

3.  On 21 December 2013, an official from the Army Reserve G-1 office notified the applicant by email that his SLRP account was activated in the amount of $10,000 and according to the Selective Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) list at the time of his reenlistment, his MOS (42F) only qualified for that amount.  In order to be authorized the incentive in the amount of $20,000 he must submit a request for an ETP.

4.  On 23 January 2014, he submitted a request for an ETP to retain his SLRP incenive in the amount of $20,000.  His chain of command, including two general officers, recommended that the applicant’s request be approved. 

5.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 20 March 2014.

6.  On 9 July 2014, the Chief, Manning Division, Headquarters, USAR Command, denied the applicant’s request for payment as an ETP, stating the Fiscal Year 2008 (FY08) SRIP list only authorized a $10,000 SLRP incentive for MOS 42F; therefore, the SLRP incentive in the amount of $20,000 was made in error and not authorized.

7.  Army Regulation 135-7 (Incentive Programs) restricts the SLRP to those Reserve Soldiers who either enlist/reenlist or extend for a skill or unit approved by the Department of the Army and disseminated to the field by a list of MOS's and units which is updated on a periodic basis.  This educational incentive may only be elected at the time of enlistment/reenlistment/extension. 

8.  The SLRP provides for the repayment by the Government of a designated portion of any outstanding student loan(s) secured after 1 October 1975.

9.  To be eligible for the SLRP incentive, a person must contractually obligate himself/herself to serve satisfactorily, must serve in a Reserve unit for a full term of the contractual agreement, and must further obligate himself or herself to continue to serve in the same component and the same MOS unless excused for the convenience of the Government.  Each completed satisfactory year of service performed under this SLRP agreement establishes an anniversary date.  Any qualifying loan that is at least 1 year old may then be paid in accordance with the terms of this educational enlistment incentive.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant entered into a contract with the understanding he was entitled to and would receive an SLRP incentive in the amount of $20,000.  There is more than sufficient evidence available to show the applicant believed he would receive the SLRP that he was promised and he completed the full term of his service obligation honorably. 

2.  Although 42F is not listed on the FY08 SRIP as a qualifying MOS for a $20,000 SLRP incentive, he should not be held responsible for the career counselor’s error and, as such, and as a matter of equity the applicant should be allowed to receive the SLRP incentive in the amount of $20,000.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be granted.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the appropriate authority approved an ETP request allowing the applicant to remain entitled to payment of his student loans in the amount of $20,000 provided he met all other criteria.




      ________________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001681





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001681



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000942

    Original file (20140000942.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In February 2011, he reenlisted for another 6 years. The applicant provides an SLRP Addendum, dated 12 March 2005, wherein it shows, in part, he was reenlisting in the USAR for a period of 6 years to serve in MOS 44B, an MOS for which he was qualified, for the SLRP in the amount of $10,000. A response dated 27 April 2008 stated according to the MOS listing issued in 2006, MOS 44B was not a qualifying MOS for the SLRP and he would need to submit an ETP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021599

    Original file (20130021599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She indicated or acknowledged she understood: * she was currently in the ARNG and was extending for 6 years in the ARNG, in the non-critical MOS of 42F and non-critical unit (4th Personnel Service Detachment) that was authorized the SLRP incentive * she was not enlisting for an AGR tour (under Title 10 or Title 32) nor was she enlisting for a technician position * she had 3 loans in the amount of $20,000 and the total amount of qualifying loans would not exceed $20,000 * her SLRP eligibility...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059791C070421

    Original file (2001059791C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he completed a Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum, DA Form 5261-4-R. In the event the applicant’s eligible student loans are no longer eligible to be paid off per regulation and law, i. e., if he has since paid off his student loans, it would be appropriate to amend the DA Form 5261-4-R, section V to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for reenlistment as payable under the SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009088

    Original file (20090009088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that when he reenlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 13 May 2002 for 6 years, he was told that he would receive $20,000 in college loan repayments in exchange for his commitment. The Office of The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 opines in its advisory opinion that although the applicant's MOS was not authorized $20,000 in college loan repayment without an additional ASI at the time of his reenlistment, based on the confusion of recruiters and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019794

    Original file (20130019794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received a $10,000 bonus in two installments of $5,000 on 6 and 8 February 2008 after being informed by MSG J, the State Incentives Manager, that he was entitled to an officer bonus and the SLRP. (2) The applicant was eligible to contract for the SLRP but was not eligible for the $5,000 SLRP payment ($804.82 of which the loan holder returned to DFAS for overpayment) he received on 20 November 2007 (9 years after the last payment was authorized, and 3 years after the contract would have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018428

    Original file (20130018428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's request for correction of his records to show he is eligible for the SLRP in the amount of $20,000 as stated in his enlistment contract has been carefully considered. The applicant's military records should be corrected to show his SLRP Addendum was amended to include the statement, "If you enlist for the SLRP and the government fails to verify that you meet the eligibility criteria for entitlement to the SLRP, and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by the SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004845

    Original file (20150004845.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 June 2014, several weeks after submitting his application for student loan repayment, he received notification that he was not authorized more than a $10,000 SLRP incentive, that he had been paid double what he was actually authorized, and that unless he obtained an exception to policy, recoupment action would be initiated. His reenlistment contract and DA Form 5261-4 (Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum) were both signed the same date by the applicant and Army Reserve Career...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003425

    Original file (20150003425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. Annex A (Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement – ARNG – Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment) to DD Form 4, dated 18 July 2012, wherein he acknowledged that: * he was enlisting in IAARNG unit identification code (UIC) WQE5AA as a non-prior service (NPS) member * he would attend basic training at Fort Jackson, SC * he would undergo training in MOS 46R (Public Affairs Broadcast Specialist) * he would accept training in an alternate MOS if offered and remain on inactive duty training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015211

    Original file (20140015211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he enlisted in the Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) on 10 December 2008 and that Section VI (Remarks) of his DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) reflects his acceptance of both the Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) and the SLRP in conjunction with his enlistment. He attests that although SLRP documents were completed at the time of his enlistment and bonus control numbers were requested, they were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003873

    Original file (20140003873.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. The State Incentive Manager requested an ETP to pay the incentive on 17 April 2013, but the National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied the request because paying the incentive violated Army National Guard (ARNG) Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06: * She accepted an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position on 16 February 2010 * The SRIP addendum was missing the applicant's and the witnessing officer's signature dates * The SLRP addendum was also dated 3 May 2009 which was after the her...